Welcome to the new CWC Digital Resource Hub (BETA)

en-ca

Building Systems

Understand modern building systems and how wood fits in.

5 results found...
Sort By Dropdown Icon

Wall Types for Water Control

Building envelope experts generally speak of three or four different approaches to design of a wall for moisture control. Face seal walls are designed to achieve water tightness and air tightness at the face of the cladding. An example would be stucco applied directly to sheathing or masonry without a moisture barrier membrane such as building paper. Joints in the cladding and interfaces with other wall components are sealed to provide continuity. The exterior face of the cladding is the primary – and only – drainage path. There is no moisture control redundancy, i.e., there is no back-up system. A face seal system must be constructed and maintained in perfect condition to effectively control rain water intrusion. In general, these walls are only recommended in low risk situations, such as wall areas under deep overhangs or in dry climates. Concealed barrier walls are designed with an acceptance that some water may pass beyond the surface of the cladding. These walls incorporate a drainage plane within the wall assembly, as a second line of defense against rain water.

The face of the cladding remains the primary drainage path, but secondary drainage is accomplished within the wall. This drainage plane consists of a membrane such as building paper, which carries water down and out of the wall assembly. An example is siding or stucco applied over building paper. Concealed barrier walls are appropriate in areas of low to moderate exposure to rain and wind. Rainscreen walls take water management one step further by incorporating a cavity between the back of the cladding and the building paper. This airspace ventilates the back of the cladding, helping it to dry out. The cavity also acts as a capillary break between cladding and building paper, thereby keeping most water from making contact with the building paper. An example of a rainscreen wall is stucco or siding applied to vertical strapping over the building paper. Rainscreen walls are appropriate in high rain and wind exposures. An advancement of the rainscreen technology is the pressure-equalized rainscreen. These walls use vents to equalize the pressure between the exterior and the cavity air, thereby removing one of the driving forces for water penetration (when it is pushed through cracks due to high pressure on the face of the wall and low pressure in the cavity). These walls are for very high risk exposures.

Importance of an Overhang

In a rainy climate, an overhang is one of the simplest and most effective ways to reduce the risk of water intrusion. An overhang is an umbrella for the wall, and the deeper the better. A survey of leaky buildings in British Columbia commissioned by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation in 1996 showed a strong inverse correlation between depth of overhang and percent of walls with problems. However, even a small overhang can help protect the wall, largely due to its effect on driving rain. One important benefit of overhangs and peaked roofs often not appreciated is the effect of these elements on wind pressure. Wind-driven rain is typically the largest source of moisture for walls. An overhang and/or sloped roof will help direct the wind up and over the building, which reduces the pressure on the wall and thereby reduces the force of the driving rain striking the wall. This means water is less likely to be pushed by wind through cracks in the wall.

Minimize the Holes

Most rainwater problems are due to water leaking into the wall through holes. If care isn’t taken to protect discontinuities in the envelope, water can leak around window framing and dryer vents, at intersections like balconies and parapets, and at building paper joints, for example. Good design detailing and careful construction is critical! So is maintenance of short-life sealants like caulk around window frames. BC Housing-Homeowner Protection Office has updated the “Best Practice Guide for Wood-Frame Envelopes in the Coastal Climate of British Columbia” originally developed by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation and published “Building Enclosure Design Guide for Wood-Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings” with extensive information on design and construction detailing.

Use our Effective R calculator to determine not only the thermal resistance of walls, but also a durability assessment of the wall based on representative climate conditions across Canada.

Related Publications
For on-line design and construction tips, try the following:The Build a Better Home program, operated by APA-The Engineered Wood Association, runs training courses, operates a demonstration houses, and offers publications. The web site offers construction information and provides links to all relevant APA publications.

Buildings

Building Enclosure Design Guide: Wood-Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings.

Buildings

 

What do the experts have to say about wood-frame mid-rise construction?

Is mid-rise and tall wood building construction a new phenomenon:

Wood-frame and heavy timber construction (up to ten storeys) was the norm in the early 1900’s, and many of these buildings still exist and are in use in many Canadian cities.

Over the past 10 years, there is a revival in the use of wood for both mid-rise (up to six-storeys) and tall buildings. In British Columbia alone, as of December 2013, there were over 250 five- and six-storey wood product based mid-rise buildings either in the design or construction phase.

Why have code change proposals?

This 2015 building code change is not about favoring wood over other building materials; it’s about acknowledging, via the highly thorough code process, that science-based innovation in wood products and building systems can and will lead to more choices for builders and occupants.

Are these buildings safe?

Regardless of the building material in question, nothing gets built unless it meets code. Mid-rise wood-frame buildings reflect a new standard of engineering in that structural, fire and seismic concerns have all been addressed by the expert committees of the Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes. As an example, when it comes to concerns from firefighters, there is increased sprinkler protection for concealed spaces and balconies, greater water supply for fire protection, restrictions on types of building claddings used and increased consideration for access by firefighters . In the end,  when occupied, these buildings fully meet the same requirements of the Building Code as any other type of construction from the perspective of health, safety and accessibility.

What are some of the new safety provisions being proposed?

Fire safety:

  • Increased level of sprinkler / water protection:
  • More  concealed spaces sprinklered
  • Balconies must be sprinklered
  • Greater water supply for fire protection
  • Non-combustible or limited combustible exterior wall cladding on 5th and 6th storey
  • 25% of perimeter must face one street (within 15m of street) for firefighter access

Seismic and wind provisions:

  • Similar to BC Building Code
  • Guidance (Appendix) on impact of increased rain and wind loads for 5- and 6-storey

Acoustics:

  • Requirements for Apparent Sound Transmission Class (ASTC)
  • Supported by science from FPInnovations, NRC and many others.

Doesn’t wood burn?

No building material is impervious to the effects of fire. The proposed code changes go above and beyond the minimum requirements outlined in the NBCC. Health, safety, accessibility, fire and structural protection of buildings remain the core objectives of the NBCC and wood industry at large.

What about construction site safety?

The Canadian Wood Council has developed construction site fire safety guides which outline best practices and safety precautions to take during the construction phase of a building.

Are mid-rise wood-frame buildings cost effective?

For the most part, yes. Mid-rise wood-frame buildings are often a less expensive construction option for builders. This is good news for main-street Canada where land is so expensive. The recommended changes to the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) would give the opportunity to erect safe, code compliant buildings that would otherwise not be possible. The net benefit of reduced construction costs is increased affordability for home buyers. In terms of new economic opportunity, the ability to move forward “now” creates new construction jobs in cities and supports employment in forestry communities. This also offers increased export opportunities for current and innovative wood products, where adoption in Canada provides the example for other countries.

In the early 1900s, light-frame wood construction and heavy timber, up to ten-storeys in height, was commonplace in major cities throughout Canada. The longevity and continued appeal of these buildings types is apparent in the fact that many of them are still in use today. Over the past decade, there has been a revival in the use of wood for taller buildings in Canada, including mid-rise light-frame wood construction up to six-storeys in height.

Mid-rise light-frame wood construction is more than basic 2×4 framing and wood sheathing panels. Advances in wood science and building technology have resulted in stronger, safer, more sophisticated engineered building products and systems that are expanding the options for wood construction, and providing more choices for builders and designers. Modern mid-rise light-frame wood construction in incorporates well researched and safe solutions. The engineering design and technology that has been developed and brought to market is positioning Canada as a leader in the mid-rise wood-frame construction industry.

In 2009, via its provincial building codes, British Columbia became the first province in Canada to allow mid-rise buildings to be made from wood. Since this change to the British Columbia Building Code (BCBC), which increased the permissible height for wood frame residential buildings from four- to six-storeys, more than 300 of these structures have been completed or are underway with BC. In 2013 and 2015, Québec, Ontario, and Alberta, respectively, also moved to permit mid-rise wood-frame construction up to six-storeys in height. These regulatory changes indicate that there is clear market confidence in this type of construction.

Scientific evidence and independent research has shown that mid-rise wood-frame buildings can meet performance requirements in regard to structural integrity, fire safety, and life safety. That evidence has now also contributed to the addition of new prescriptive provisions for wood construction, as well as paved the way for future changes that will include more permissible uses and ultimately greater permissible heights for wood buildings. As a result of this research, and the successful implementation of many mid-rise wood-frame residential buildings, primarily in British Columbia and Ontario, the Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes (CCBFC) approved similar changes to the National Model Construction Codes. The 2015 edition of the National Building Code of Canada (NBC) permits the construction of six-storey residential, business, and personal services buildings using traditional combustible construction materials. The NBC changes recognize the advancements in wood products and building systems, as well as in fire detection, suppression, and containment systems.

In relation to mid-rise wood-frame buildings, several changes to the 2015 NBC are designed to further reduce the risks posed by fire, including:

  • increased use of automatic sprinklers in concealed areas in residential buildings;
  • increased use of sprinklers on balconies;
  • greater water supply for firefighting purposes; and
  • 90 percent noncombustible or limited-combustible exterior cladding on all storeys.

Most mid-rise wood-frame buildings are located in the core of smaller municipalities and in the inner suburbs of larger ones, offering economic and sustainability advantages. Mid-rise wood-frame construction supports the goals of many municipalities; densification, affordable housing to accommodate a growing population, sustainability in the built environment and resilient communities.

Many of these buildings have employed light-frame wood construction from the ground up, with a five- or six-storey wood-frame structure being constructed on a concrete slab-on-grade, or on top of a concrete basement parking garage; others have been constructed above one- or two-storeys of noncombustible commercial occupancy.

Mid-rise wood buildings are inherently more complex and involve the adaptation of structural and architectural details that address considerations related to structural, acoustic, thermal and fire performance design criteria. Several key aspects of design and construction that become more critical in this new generation of mid-rise wood buildings include:

  • increased potential for cumulative shrinkage and differential movement between different types of materials, as a result of the increased building height;
  • increased, dead, live, wind and seismic loads that are a consequence of taller building height;
  • requirements for continuous stacked shearwall layouts;
  • increased fire-resistance ratings for fire separations, as required for buildings of greater height and area;
  • ratings for sound transmission, as required for buildings of multi-family residential occupancy, as well as other uses;
  • potential for longer exposure to the elements during construction;
  • mitigation of risk related to fire during construction; and
  • modified construction sequencing and coordination, resulting from the employment of prefabrication technologies and processes.

There are many alternative approaches and solutions to these new design and construction considerations that are associated with mid-rise wood construction systems. Reference publications produced by the Canadian Wood Council provide more detailed discussion, case studies and details for mid-rise design and construction techniques.

 

For further information, refer to the following resources:

Mid-Rise Best Practice Guide (Canadian Wood Council)

2015 Reference Guide: Mid-Rise Wood Construction in the Ontario Building Code (Canadian Wood Council)

Mid-Rise 2.0 – Innovative Approaches to Mid-Rise Wood Frame Construction (Canadian Wood Council)

Mid-Rise Construction in British Columbia (Canadian Wood Council)

National Building Code of Canada

Wood Design Manual (Canadian Wood Council)

CSA O86 Engineering design in wood

Wood for Mid-Rise Construction (Wood WORKS! Atlantic)

Fire Safety and Security: A Technical Note on Fire Safety and Security on Construction Sites in British Columbia/Ontario (Canadian Wood Council)

Les ponts en bois sont depuis longtemps des éléments essentiels des réseaux routiers, ferroviaires et forestiers du Canada. Dépendant de la disponibilité des matériaux, de la technologie et de la main-d’œuvre, la conception et la construction des ponts en bois ont évolué de manière significative au cours des 200 dernières années dans toute l’Amérique du Nord. Les ponts en bois prennent de nombreuses formes et utilisent différents systèmes de support, notamment des ponts en rondins à portée simple, différents types de ponts à treillis, ainsi que des tabliers et des éléments de pont en matériaux composites ou stratifiés. Les ponts en bois restent un élément important de notre réseau de transport au Canada.

Les avantages de la construction de ponts en bois modernes sont les suivants :

  • un coût initial réduit, en particulier pour les régions éloignées ;
  • la rapidité de la construction, grâce à l’utilisation de la préfabrication ;
  • avantages en matière de durabilité ;
  • l’esthétique ;
  • des fondations plus légères ;
  • des charges sismiques plus faibles, associées à des connexions moins complexes avec les sous-structures ;
  • les structures temporaires et les grues de plus petite taille ; et
  • des coûts de transport moins élevés associés à des matériaux moins lourds.

Les différents types de matériaux utilisés pour la construction des ponts en bois sont les suivants : bois de sciage, rondins, bois lamellé-collé droit et courbe (lamellé-collé), bois de placage stratifié (LVL), bois à copeaux parallèles (PSL), bois lamellé-croisé (CLT), bois lamellé-cloué (NLT) et systèmes composites tels que les tabliers stratifiés sous contrainte, les tabliers stratifiés bois-béton et les polymères renforcés par des fibres.

Les deux principales essences de bois utilisées pour la construction de ponts en bois au Canada sont le sapin de Douglas et la combinaison d’essences épicéa-pin-sapin. D’autres espèces appartenant aux combinaisons d’espèces Hem-Fir et Northern sont également reconnues par la norme CSA O86, mais elles sont moins couramment utilisées dans la construction de ponts.

Toutes les fixations métalliques utilisées pour les ponts doivent être protégées contre la corrosion. La méthode la plus courante pour assurer cette protection est la galvanisation à chaud, un processus par lequel un métal sacrificiel est ajouté à l’extérieur de la fixation. Les différents types de fixations utilisés dans la construction de ponts en bois comprennent, entre autres, les boulons, les tire-fonds, les anneaux fendus, les plaques de cisaillement et les clous (pour les stratifiés de pont uniquement).

Tous les ponts routiers au Canada doivent être conçus pour répondre aux exigences des normes CSA S6 et CSA O86. La norme CSA S6 exige que les principaux éléments structurels de tout pont au Canada, quel que soit le type de construction, soient capables de résister à un minimum de 75 ans de charge pendant sa durée de vie.

Le style et la portée des ponts varient considérablement en fonction de l’application. Dans les endroits difficiles d’accès et les vallées profondes, les ponts à chevalets en bois étaient courants à la fin des années 19th siècle et au début des années 20th siècle. Historiquement, les ponts à chevalets dépendaient fortement de l’abondance des ressources en bois et, dans certains cas, étaient considérés comme temporaires. La construction initiale des chemins de fer transcontinentaux d’Amérique du Nord n’aurait pas été possible sans l’utilisation de bois pour construire les ponts et les chevalets.

De nombreux exemples de ponts en bois à treillis ont été construits depuis plus d’un siècle. Les ponts à poutres en treillis permettent des portées plus longues que les ponts à poutres simples et, historiquement, leurs portées étaient comprises entre 30 et 60 m (100 et 200 pieds). Les ponts conçus avec des fermes situées au-dessus du tablier offrent une excellente occasion de construire un toit au-dessus de la chaussée. L’installation d’un toit au-dessus de la chaussée est un excellent moyen d’évacuer l’eau de la structure principale du pont et de la protéger du soleil. La présence de ces toits est la principale raison pour laquelle ces ponts couverts centenaires sont encore en service aujourd’hui. Le fait qu’ils fassent toujours partie de notre paysage témoigne autant de leur robustesse que de leur attrait.

Bien que conçue à l’origine comme une mesure de réhabilitation des tabliers de ponts vieillissants, la technique de stratification sous contrainte a été étendue aux nouveaux ponts par l’application de contraintes au moment de la construction initiale. Les tabliers stratifiés sous contrainte offrent un meilleur comportement structurel, grâce à leur excellente résistance aux effets des charges répétées.

Les trois principales considérations liées à la durabilité des ponts en bois sont la protection par la conception, le traitement de préservation du bois et les éléments remplaçables. Un pont peut être conçu de manière à s’auto-protéger en détournant l’eau des éléments structurels. Le bois traité a la capacité de résister aux effets des produits chimiques de déglaçage et aux attaques des agents biotiques. Enfin, le pont doit être conçu de manière à ce que, à un moment donné, un seul élément puisse être remplacé relativement facilement, sans perturbation ni coût importants.

 

Pour plus d’informations, consultez les ressources suivantes :

  • Ponts routiers en bois (Conseil canadien du bois)
  • Guide de référence sur les ponts en bois de l’Ontario (Conseil canadien du bois)
  • CSA S6 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code
  • CSA O86 Conception technique du bois

Tests

Current research includes the World’s largest mass timber fire test – click here for updates on the test results currently being conducted https://firetests.cwc.ca/

Studies

Reports

Fire Research

Acoustics Research and Guides

Tall Wood Building Demonstration Initiative Test Reports
(funding provided by Natural Resources Canada)

Visit Think Wood’s Research Library for additional resources

Get Access to Our Resources

Stay in the loop and don’t miss a thing!

1
2
3

Get Access to Our Resources

Stay in the loop and don’t miss a thing!

What’s Your Occupation?

Help us personalize the content for you.

What Interests You the Most?

Help us personalize the content for you.

Filters

Persona Icon
Persona
Tags Icon
Tags
Annual Reports Plus Icon
Award Book Plus Icon
Case Studies Plus Icon
Free Publications Plus Icon
Magazine Plus Icon
Building Systems Plus Icon
Codes & Standards Plus Icon
Industry News Plus Icon
Why Wood (FAQ) Plus Icon
Wood Products Plus Icon
Acoustics Plus Icon
Design Examples Plus Icon
Engineering Plus Icon
Fire Resistance Plus Icon
Insurance Plus Icon
Mass Timber Plus Icon
Date Icon
Date
Line Separator