Welcome to the new CWC Digital Resource Hub (BETA)

Building with Wood

Explore our diverse range of topics related to building with wood.

54 results found...
Sort By Dropdown Icon

Fortunately for Canada, most of this country lies north of the limit for termites on the North American continent. However, because termites and people both prefer the warmer parts of this country, 20% of Canada’s population live in areas where termites are present. Long winters limit termite activity in the wild, but the warmth provided by our buildings seems to encourage more serious problems in urban environments. Damage caused by the Eastern subterranean termite, (Reticulitermes flavipes Kollar), has reached economically important levels in areas of Toronto and other cities in Southern Ontario. There are some suggestions that the Western subterranean termite, (Reticulitermes hesperus Banks), may be causing significant damage in the Okanagan region of British Columbia.

Termites are a much more serious threat in many of our export markets such as the Southeastern USA, Japan and Southeast Asia. While termite control measures appropriate to each region are specified in local and regional building codes, an overview of such measures may be of use to Canadian marketers of wood products and manufactured homes. Termite control measures can be broadly grouped into six categories:

  1. Suppression
  2. Site Management
  3. Soil Barrier
  4. Slab/foundation details
  5. Structural durability
  6. Surveillance and Remediation

Click Here for more details on the 6 strategies

More Information

 

Termite Control and Wood-Frame Buildings– 11-page illustrated bulletin from CWC, further covering the 6-point integrated strategy discussed. Includes photos of termite control products.

Integrated Control of Subterranean Termites: The 6S Approach. This 20-page Forintek paper introduces and thoroughly discusses the 6-point integrated strategy. Includes very specific design and maintenance advice.
Termite Map of North America

 

Combatting Termites – very short and simple summary fact sheet from Forintek.

Holes drilled to apply depot, supplementary or remedial treatments should be on vertical surfaces or undersides, where possible, to avoid creating additional routes for moisture entry. In the case of supplementary treatment, cut ends should be placed so they are not in ground contact where possible.

Holes for treatment should not be drilled below ground level if it can possibly be avoided. All holes should be closed with a tight-fitting plug. Ideally this should be removable to allow re-treatment. Holes for water-soluble treatments should be placed in the right locations to intercept moisture close to its points of entry. Look carefully at the structure and think about moisture sources, water traps, moisture entry points, moisture flow and signs of moisture entry.

Moisture sources include direct rainfall, diverted rainfall (via windows, cladding, balcony and walkway surfaces, roof overhangs, flashing, parapets, eavestroughs and downspouts), rain penetration of moisture barriers via nail holes, splits, failure of joints or deterioration of caulking, rain splash, blowing snow, ice dams, condensation, concrete foundations, soil contact, irrigation systems, drain and plumbing leaks.

Water traps include metal “shoes”, V joints, checks, appressed boards, cupped horizontal surfaces and anywhere a rim is created at the edge of a horizontal surface. Accumulation of dirt and debris often indicates a water trap. Growth of algae also indicates locations where moisture hangs around longer after rain.

Moisture entry points include all locations with end grain, around nails, screws and bolts plus any other holes or penetrations, checks and delaminations.

Moisture flow in wood may be 100 to 1000 times faster along than across the grain. Patterns of moisture distribution in wood are therefore commonly elongated cones or lens shapes centred on the point of entry.

Signs of moisture entry include swelling, darker colouration, fungal stain, iron stain around fasteners, nail popping and flaking of film-forming surface finishes. Confirmation of moisture contents conducive to decay can be made using electrical-resistance type moisture meters. Capacitance-type moisture meters may also be useful, but these can give erroneous results in the area of metal fittings.

Click Here for more information of field treatment

The durability of wood is often a function of water, but that doesn’t mean wood can never get wet. Quite the contrary, wood and water usually live happily together. Wood is a hygroscopic material, which means it naturally takes on and gives off water to balance out with its surrounding environment. Wood can safely absorb large quantities of water before reaching moisture content levels that will be inviting for decay fungi.

Moisture content (MC) is a measure of how much water is in a piece of wood relative to the wood itself. MC is expressed as a percentage and is calculated by dividing the weight of the water in the wood by the weight of that wood if it were oven dry. For example, 200% MC means a piece of wood has twice as much of its weight due to water than to wood. Two important MC numbers to remember are 19% and 28%. We tend to call a piece of wood dry if it is at 19% or less moisture content. Fiber saturation averages around 28%.

Fiber saturation is an important benchmark for both shrinkage and for decay. The fibers of wood (the cells that run the length of the tree) are shaped like tapered drinking straws. When fibers absorb water, it first is held in the cell walls themselves. When the cell walls are full, any additional water absorbed by the wood will now go to fill up the cavities of these tubular cells. Fiber saturation is the level of moisture content where the cell walls are holding as much water as they can. Water held in the cell walls is called bound water, while water in the cell cavities is called free water. As the name implies, the free water is relatively accessible, and an accessible source of water is one necessity for decay fungi to start growing. Therefore, decay can generally only get started if the moisture content of the wood is above fiber saturation. The fiber saturation point is also the limit for wood shrinkage. Wood shrinks or swells as its moisture content changes, but only when water is taken up or given off from the cell walls. Any change in water content in the cell cavity will have no effect on the dimension of the wood. Therefore, wood only shrinks and swells when it changes moisture content below the point of fiber saturation.

Like other hygroscopic materials, wood placed in an environment with stable temperature and relative humidity will eventually reach a moisture content that yields no vapor pressure difference between the wood and the surrounding air. In other words, its moisture content will stabilize at a point called the equilibrium moisture content (EMC). Wood used indoors will eventually stabilize at 8-14% moisture content; outdoors at 12-18%. Hygroscopicity isn’t necessarily a bad thing – this allows wood to function as a natural humidity controller in our homes. When the indoor air is very dry, wood will release moisture. When the indoor air is too humid, wood will absorb moisture.

Wood shrinks/swells when it loses/gains moisture below its fiber saturation point. This natural behaviour of wood is responsible for some of the problems sometimes encountered when wood dries. For example, special cracks called checks can result from stresses induced in a piece of wood that is drying. As the piece dries, it develops a moisture gradient across its section (dry on the outside, wet on the inside). The dry outer shell wants to shrink as it dries below fiber saturation, however, the wetter core constrains the shell. This can cause checks to form on the surface. The shell is now set in its dimension, although the core is still drying and will in turn want to shrink. But the fixed shell constrains the core and checks can thus form in the core. Another problem associated with drying is warp. A piece of wood can deviate from its expected shape as it dries due to the fact that wood shrinks different amounts in different directions. It shrinks the most in the direction tangential to the rings, about half as much in the direction perpendicular to the rings, and hardly at all along the length of the tree. Where in the log a piece was cut will be a factor in how it changes shape as it shrinks. One advantage of usingdry lumber is that most of the shrinkage has been achieved prior to purchase. Dry lumber is lumber with a moisture content no greater than 19%; wood does most of its shrinking as it drops from 28-19%. Dry lumber will have already shown its drying defects, if any. It will also lead to less surprises in a finished building, as the product will stay more or less at the dimension it was upon installation. Dry lumber will be stamped with the letters S-DRY (for surfaced dry) or KD (for kiln dry).

Another way to avoid shrinkage and warp is to use composite wood products, also called engineeredwood products. These are the products that are assembled from smaller pieces of wood glued together – for example, plywood, OSB, finger-jointed studs and I-joists. Composite products have a mix of log orientations within a single piece, so one part constrains the movement of another. For example, plywood achieves this crossbanding form of self-constraint. In other products, movements are limited to very small areas and tend to average out in the whole piece, as with finger-jointed studs.

Wood is biodegradable – that’s a characteristic we normally consider to be one of the benefits of choosing natural materials. Organisms exist that can break down wood into its basic chemicals so that fallen logs in the forest can contribute to the growth of the next generation of life. This process – essential in the forest – must be prevented when we use wood in buildings.

A variety of fungi, insects, and marine borers have the capability to break down the complex polymers which make up the wood structure. In Canada, fungi are a more serious problem than insects. The wood-inhabiting fungi can be separated into moulds, stainers, soft-rot fungi and wood-rotting basidiomycetes. The moulds and stainers can discolour the wood however they do not significantly damage the wood structurally. Soft-rot fungi and wood-rotting basidiomycetes can cause strength loss in wood, with the basidiomycetes the ones responsible for decay problems in buildings. With regard to insects, carpenter ants only cause problems in decayed wood, and significant subterranean termite activity is confined to a few southern areas of Canada. However, other parts of the world have a serious problem with termites.

A decaying log Decayed wood is the result of a series of events including a sequence of fungal colonization. The spores of these fungi are ubiquitous in the air for much of the year. Wood-rotting fungi require wood as their food source, an equable temperature, oxygen and water. Water is normally the only one of these factors that we can easily manage. This may be made more difficult by some fungi, which can transport water to otherwise dry wood. It can also be difficult to control moisture once decay has started, since the fungi produce water as a result of the decay process.

The outer portion of this log is being attacked by a decay fungus. Note that the damage is held back at the line between heartwood and sapwood. To understand why, click here to read about natural durability.

 

More Information

Click Here for a 26-page paper on biodeterioration, including illustrations and bibliography.

For answers to common questions on decay, visit the FAQ page

Termites, sometimes called “white ants” are a social insect, more closely related to cockroaches than ants. They can be distinguished from ants by the absence of a narrow waist on the body and their typically white colour. Under a hand lens, termite antennae are straight whereas those of ants have an elbow. Flying reproductive termites (alates) can be distinguished from flying ants by the equal size of all four termite wings. Three types of termites can be distinguished on the basis of their moisture requirements:

  • Damp-wood termites
  • Dry-wood termites
  • Subterranean termites

Termites

Damp-wood termites are particularly prevalent in coastal British Columbia and the Pacific Northwest of the USA. They only attack and help physically break down decaying trees in forest ecosystems and can be controlled by eliminating the moisture source which has led to decay. They are rarely a problem in buildings.

Termites2

Dry-wood termites on the other hand pose significant hazards to exposed, accessible wooden infrastructure, since they need no significant moisture source, and mated pairs can fly into buildings and start up a nest in dry wood. Consequently, control measures designed to separate wood from soil or moisture are ineffective. On the North American Continent, dry-wood termites are found only from the extreme south of the USA into Mexico.

Subterranean termites do need a reliable source of moisture, normally the soil, but they have the capability to carry their required moisture needs into dry wood in buildings. Although satellite nests can occur in buildings, their main nests are normally in soil or wood in contact with soil. Subterranean termites build characteristic shelter-tubes (tunnels) of mud, wood fragments and bodily secretions, which allow them to pass from the soil to wood above ground without being exposed to drying air or predators. These shelter tubes can extend for several metres over inert substrates, such as concrete foundation walls. Termites can also pass through cracks in concrete as narrow as 1.5 mm. Within the subterranean group, one particular species: the Formosan termite (Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki), is the most problematic for wooden infrastructure. Although individuals are smaller than the species mentioned above, because of sheer numbers Formosan termite colonies can be nine times more aggressive in terms of wood consumption. This species is particularly problematic in parts of Southeastern USA, particularly Florida, where it was introduced after WWII. It is unlikely to spread north into Canada although Canada does have other, less-aggressive species of subterranean termites. Subterranean termites are the most economically important group worldwide.

More Information

Click here for a termite map of Canada.

Click here for a termite map of SW Ontario.

Click here for a termite map of British Columbia. 

 

Additional Sources of Information on Termites

Louisiana State University Agricultural Center

City of Guelph

Municipality of Kincardine

 

With advanced construction technologies and modern mass timber products such as glued-laminated timber, cross-laminated timber and structural composite lumber, building tall with wood is not only achievable but already underway – with completed contemporary buildings in Australia, Austria, Switzerland, Germany, Norway and the United Kingdom at 9 storeys and taller. Increasingly recognized by the construction sector as an important, new, and safe construction choice, the reduced carbon footprint and embodied / operational energy performance of these buildings is appealing to communities that are committed to sustainable development and climate change mitigation.

Tall wood buildings, built with renewable wood products from sustainably managed forests, have the potential to revolutionize a construction industry increasingly focused on being part of the solution when it comes to urban intensification and environmental impact reduction. The Canadian wood product industry is committed to building on its natural advantage, through the development and demonstration of continuously improving wood-based building products and building systems.

A tall wood building is a building over six-storeys in height (top floor is higher than 18 m above grade) that utilizes mass timber elements as a functional component of its structural support system. With advanced construction technologies and modern mass timber products such as glued-laminated timber (glulam), cross-laminated timber (CLT) and structural composite lumber (SCL), building tall with wood is not only achievable but already underway – with completed contemporary buildings in Canada, US, Australia, Austria, Switzerland, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Italy and the United Kingdom at seven-storeys and taller.

Tall wood buildings incorporate modern fire suppression and protection systems, along with new technologies for acoustic and thermal performance. Tall wood buildings are commonly employed for residential, commercial and institutional occupancies.

Mass timber offers advantages such as improved dimensional stability and better fire performance during construction and occupancy. These new products are also prefabricated and offer tremendous opportunities to improve the speed of erection and quality of construction.

Some significant advantages of tall wood buildings include:

  • the ability to build higher in areas of poor soils, as the super structure and foundations are lighter compared to other building materials;
  • quieter to build on site, which means neighbours are less likely to complain and workers are not exposed to high levels of noise;
  • worker safety during construction can be improved with the ability to work off large mass timber floor plates;
  • prefabricated components manufactured to tight tolerances can reduce the duration of construction;
  • tight tolerances in the building structure and building envelope coupled with energy modelling can produce buildings with high operational energy performance, increased air tightness, better indoor air quality and improved human comfort

Design criteria for tall wood buildings that should be considered include: an integrated design, approvals and construction strategy, differential shrinkage between dissimilar materials, acoustic performance, behaviour under wind and seismic loads, fire performance (e.g., encapsulating the mass timber elements using gypsum), durability, and construction sequencing to reduce the exposure of wood to the elements.

It is important to ensure early involvement by a mass timber supplier that can provide design assistance services that can further reduce manufacturing costs through the optimization of the entire building system and not just individual elements. Even small contributions, in connection designs for example, can make a difference to the speed of erection and overall cost. In addition, mechanical and electrical trades should be invited in a design-assist role at the outset of the project. This allows for a more complete virtual model, additional prefabrication opportunities and quicker installation.

Recent case studies of modern tall wood buildings in Canada and around the world showcase the fact that wood is a viable solution for attaining a safe, cost-effective and high-performance tall building.

For more information, refer to the following case studies and references:

Brock Commons Tall Wood House (Canadian Wood Council)

Origine Point-aux-Lievres Ecocondos,Quebec City (Cecobois)

Wood Innovation and Design Centre (Canadian Wood Council)

Technical Guide for the Design and Construction of Tall Wood Buildings in Canada (FPInnovations)

Ontario’s Tall Wood Building Reference (Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry & Ministry of Municipal Affairs)

Summary Report: Survey of International Tall Wood Buildings (Forestry Innovation Investment & Binational Softwood Lumber Council)

www.thinkwood.com/building-better/taller-buildings

When it comes to wood construction, many people think of basic 2×4 framing, panels or flooring for single-family homes. However, advances in wood science and building technology have resulted in stronger, more sophisticated and robust products that are expanding the options for wood construction, and providing more choices for builders and architects.

The Canadian Wood Council’s support for mid-rise construction is not unique In Ontario, Home Builders, through organizations such as RESCON, BILD and the Ontario Home Builders Association are also highlighting this opportunity.

  • Mid-rise buildings made of wood are a new construction option for builders. That’s good news for main-street Canada, where land is so expensive. The net benefit of reduced construction costs is increased affordability for home buyers.
  • In terms of new economic opportunity, the ability to move forward “now” creates new construction jobs in cities and supports employment in forestry communities. This also offers increased export opportunities for current and innovative wood products, where adoption in Canada provides the example for other countries.
  • This also reflects a new standard of engineering in that structural, fire and seismic concerns have all been addressed by the expert committees of the Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes.

In the end, when occupied, mid-rise buildings fully meet the same requirements of the Building Code as any other type of construction from the perspective of health, safety and accessibility.

 

Les ponts en bois sont depuis longtemps des éléments essentiels des réseaux routiers, ferroviaires et forestiers du Canada. Dépendant de la disponibilité des matériaux, de la technologie et de la main-d’œuvre, la conception et la construction des ponts en bois ont évolué de manière significative au cours des 200 dernières années dans toute l’Amérique du Nord. Les ponts en bois prennent de nombreuses formes et utilisent différents systèmes de support, notamment des ponts en rondins à portée simple, différents types de ponts à treillis, ainsi que des tabliers et des éléments de pont en matériaux composites ou stratifiés. Les ponts en bois restent un élément important de notre réseau de transport au Canada.

Les avantages de la construction de ponts en bois modernes sont les suivants :

  • un coût initial réduit, en particulier pour les régions éloignées ;
  • la rapidité de la construction, grâce à l’utilisation de la préfabrication ;
  • avantages en matière de durabilité ;
  • l’esthétique ;
  • des fondations plus légères ;
  • des charges sismiques plus faibles, associées à des connexions moins complexes avec les sous-structures ;
  • les structures temporaires et les grues de plus petite taille ; et
  • des coûts de transport moins élevés associés à des matériaux moins lourds.

Les différents types de matériaux utilisés pour la construction des ponts en bois sont les suivants : bois de sciage, rondins, bois lamellé-collé droit et courbe (lamellé-collé), bois de placage stratifié (LVL), bois à copeaux parallèles (PSL), bois lamellé-croisé (CLT), bois lamellé-cloué (NLT) et systèmes composites tels que les tabliers stratifiés sous contrainte, les tabliers stratifiés bois-béton et les polymères renforcés par des fibres.

Les deux principales essences de bois utilisées pour la construction de ponts en bois au Canada sont le sapin de Douglas et la combinaison d’essences épicéa-pin-sapin. D’autres espèces appartenant aux combinaisons d’espèces Hem-Fir et Northern sont également reconnues par la norme CSA O86, mais elles sont moins couramment utilisées dans la construction de ponts.

Toutes les fixations métalliques utilisées pour les ponts doivent être protégées contre la corrosion. La méthode la plus courante pour assurer cette protection est la galvanisation à chaud, un processus par lequel un métal sacrificiel est ajouté à l’extérieur de la fixation. Les différents types de fixations utilisés dans la construction de ponts en bois comprennent, entre autres, les boulons, les tire-fonds, les anneaux fendus, les plaques de cisaillement et les clous (pour les stratifiés de pont uniquement).

Tous les ponts routiers au Canada doivent être conçus pour répondre aux exigences des normes CSA S6 et CSA O86. La norme CSA S6 exige que les principaux éléments structurels de tout pont au Canada, quel que soit le type de construction, soient capables de résister à un minimum de 75 ans de charge pendant sa durée de vie.

Le style et la portée des ponts varient considérablement en fonction de l’application. Dans les endroits difficiles d’accès et les vallées profondes, les ponts à chevalets en bois étaient courants à la fin des années 19th siècle et au début des années 20th siècle. Historiquement, les ponts à chevalets dépendaient fortement de l’abondance des ressources en bois et, dans certains cas, étaient considérés comme temporaires. La construction initiale des chemins de fer transcontinentaux d’Amérique du Nord n’aurait pas été possible sans l’utilisation de bois pour construire les ponts et les chevalets.

De nombreux exemples de ponts en bois à treillis ont été construits depuis plus d’un siècle. Les ponts à poutres en treillis permettent des portées plus longues que les ponts à poutres simples et, historiquement, leurs portées étaient comprises entre 30 et 60 m (100 et 200 pieds). Les ponts conçus avec des fermes situées au-dessus du tablier offrent une excellente occasion de construire un toit au-dessus de la chaussée. L’installation d’un toit au-dessus de la chaussée est un excellent moyen d’évacuer l’eau de la structure principale du pont et de la protéger du soleil. La présence de ces toits est la principale raison pour laquelle ces ponts couverts centenaires sont encore en service aujourd’hui. Le fait qu’ils fassent toujours partie de notre paysage témoigne autant de leur robustesse que de leur attrait.

Bien que conçue à l’origine comme une mesure de réhabilitation des tabliers de ponts vieillissants, la technique de stratification sous contrainte a été étendue aux nouveaux ponts par l’application de contraintes au moment de la construction initiale. Les tabliers stratifiés sous contrainte offrent un meilleur comportement structurel, grâce à leur excellente résistance aux effets des charges répétées.

Les trois principales considérations liées à la durabilité des ponts en bois sont la protection par la conception, le traitement de préservation du bois et les éléments remplaçables. Un pont peut être conçu de manière à s’auto-protéger en détournant l’eau des éléments structurels. Le bois traité a la capacité de résister aux effets des produits chimiques de déglaçage et aux attaques des agents biotiques. Enfin, le pont doit être conçu de manière à ce que, à un moment donné, un seul élément puisse être remplacé relativement facilement, sans perturbation ni coût importants.

 

Pour plus d’informations, consultez les ressources suivantes :

  • Ponts routiers en bois (Conseil canadien du bois)
  • Guide de référence sur les ponts en bois de l’Ontario (Conseil canadien du bois)
  • CSA S6 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code
  • CSA O86 Conception technique du bois

Tests

Current research includes the World’s largest mass timber fire test – click here for updates on the test results currently being conducted https://firetests.cwc.ca/

Studies

Reports

Fire Research

Acoustics Research and Guides

Tall Wood Building Demonstration Initiative Test Reports
(funding provided by Natural Resources Canada)

Visit Think Wood’s Research Library for additional resources

Studies

General

Structural & Seismic

Vertical Movement in Wood Platform Frame Structures (CWC Fact Sheets)

Design of multi-storey wood-based shearwalls: Linear dynamic analysis & mechanics based approach

Fire

Testing

Fire Research

Research for Wood and Wood-Hybrid Mid-Rise Buildings Project
National Research Council Canada (2011-2015)

Other Reports

Acoustics Research

Research for Wood and Wood-Hybrid Mid-Rise Buildings Project
National Research Council Canada (2011-2015)

Other Reports & Guides

Building Envelope Research

Research for Wood and Wood-Hybrid Mid-Rise Buildings Project
National Research Council Canada (2011-2015)

Visit Think Wood’s Research Library for additional resources

banner for research.thinkwood.com

Wood is the only major building material that grows naturally and is renewable. With growing pressure to reduce the carbon footprint of the built environment, building designers are increasingly being called upon to balance function and cost objectives of a building with reduced environmental impact. Wood can help to achieve that balance. Numerous life cycle assessment studies worldwide have shown that wood products yield clear environmental advantages over other building materials at every stage. Wood buildings can offer lower greenhouse gas emissions, less air pollution, lower volumes of solid waste and less ecological resource use.

Of all the energy used in North America, it is estimated that 30 to 40 percent is consumed by buildings. In Canada, the majority of operational energy in residential buildings is provided by natural gas, fuel oil, or electricity, and is consumed for space heating. Given the fact that buildings are a significant source of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in Canada, energy efficiency in the buildings sector is essential to address climate change mitigation targets.

As outlined in the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change, the federal, provincial and territorial governments are committed to investment in initiatives to support energy efficient homes and buildings as well as energy benchmarking and labelling programs.

Despite the expanding number of choices for consumers, the most cost-effective way to increase building energy performance has remained unchanged over the decades:

• maximize the thermal performance of the building envelope by adding more insulation and reducing thermal bridging; and

• increase the airtightness of the building envelope.

The building envelope is commonly defined as the collection of components that separate conditioned space from unconditioned space (exterior air or ground). The thermal performance and airtightness of the building envelope (also known as the building enclosure) effects the whole-building energy efficiency and significantly affects the amount of heat losses and gains. Building and energy codes and standards within Canada have undergone or are currently undergoing revisions, and the minimum thermal performance requirements for wood-frame building enclosure assemblies are now more stringent. The most energy efficient buildings are made with materials that resist heat flow and are constructed with accuracy to make the best use of insulation and air barriers.

To maximize energy efficiency, exterior wall and roof assemblies must be designed using framing materials that resist heat flow, and must include continuous air barriers, insulation materials, and weather barriers to prevent air leakage through the building envelope.

The resistance to heat flow of building envelope assemblies depends on the characteristics of the materials used. Insulated assemblies are not usually homogeneous throughout the building envelope. In light-frame walls or roofs, the framing members occur at regular intervals, and, at these locations, there is a different rate of heat transfer than in the spaces between the framing members. The framing members reduce the thermal resistance of the overall wall or ceiling assembly. The rate of heat transfer at the location of framing elements depends on the thermal or insulating properties of the structural framing material. The higher rate of heat transfer at the location of framing members is called thermal bridging. The framing members of a wall or roof can account for 20 percent or more of the surface area of an exterior wall or roof and since the thermal performance of the overall assembly depends on the combined effect of the framing and insulation, the thermal properties of the framing materials can have a significant effect on the overall (effective) thermal resistance of the assembly.

Wood is a natural thermal insulator due to the millions of tiny air pockets within its cellular structure. Since thermal conductivity increases with relative density, wood is a better insulator than dense construction materials. With respect to thermal performance, wood-frame building enclosures are inherently more efficient than other common construction materials, largely because of reduced thermal bridging through the wood structural elements, including the wood studs, columns, beams, and floors. Wood loses less heat through conduction than other building materials and wood-frame construction techniques support a wide range of insulation options, including stud cavity insulation and exterior rigid insulation.

Research and monitoring of buildings is increasingly demonstrating the importance of reducing thermal bridging in new construction and reducing thermal bridges in existing buildings. The impact of thermal bridges can be a significant contributor to whole building energy use, the risk of condensation on cold surfaces, and occupant comfort.

Focusing on the building envelope and ventilation at the time of construction makes sense, as it is difficult to make changes to these systems in the future. High performance buildings typically cost more to build than conventional construction, but the higher purchase price is offset, at least in part, by lower energy consumption costs over the life cycle. What’s more, high performance buildings are often of higher quality and more comfortable to live and work in. Making buildings more energy efficient has also been shown to be one of the lowest cost opportunities to contribute to energy reduction and climate change mitigation goals.

Several certification and labeling programs are available to builders and consumers address reductions in energy consumption within buildings.

Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) administers the R-2000 program, which aims to reduce home energy requirements by 50 percent compared to a code-built home. Another program administered by NRCan, ENERGY STAR®, aims to be 20 to 25 percent more energy efficient than code. The EnerGuide Rating System estimates the energy performance of a house and can be used for both existing homes and in the planning phase for new construction.

Other certification programs and labelling systems have fixed performance targets. Passive House is a rigorous standard for energy efficiency in buildings to reduce the energy use and enhance overall performance. The space heating load must be less than 15 kWh/m2 and the airtightness must be less than 0.6 air changes per hour at 50 Pa, resulting in ultra-low energy buildings that require up to 90 percent less heating and cooling energy than conventional buildings.

The NetZero Energy Building Certification, a program operated by the International Living Future Institute, is a performance-based program and requires that the building have net-zero energy consumption for twelve consecutive months.

Green Globes and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) are additional building rating systems that are prevalent in the building design and construction marketplace.

 

For further information, refer to the following resources:

Thermal Performance of Light-Frame Assemblies – IBS No.5 (Canadian Wood Council)

National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings

Natural Resources Canada

BC Housing

Passive House Canada

Green Globes

Canadian Green Building Council

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association (NAIMA)

International Living Future Institute

Get Access to Our Resources

Stay in the loop and don’t miss a thing!

1
2
3

Get Access to Our Resources

Stay in the loop and don’t miss a thing!

What’s Your Occupation?

Help us personalize the content for you.

What Interests You the Most?

Help us personalize the content for you.

Filters

Persona Icon
Persona
Tags Icon
Tags
Annual Reports Plus Icon
Award Book Plus Icon
Case Studies Plus Icon
Free Publications Plus Icon
Magazine Plus Icon
Building Systems Plus Icon
Codes & Standards Plus Icon
Industry News Plus Icon
Why Wood (FAQ) Plus Icon
Wood Products Plus Icon
Acoustics Plus Icon
Design Examples Plus Icon
Engineering Plus Icon
Fire Resistance Plus Icon
Insurance Plus Icon
Mass Timber Plus Icon
Date Icon
Date
Line Separator