About Treated Wood
When you want to use wood that is not naturally decay resistant in a wet application (outdoors, for example) or where it may be at risk for insect attack, you need to specify preservative-treated wood. This is lumber that has been chemically treated to make it unattractive to fungi and other pests. In the same way that you would specify galvanized steel where it would be at risk of rusting, you specify treated wood where it will be used in a setting conducive to decay. Wood does not deteriorate just because it gets wet. When wood breaks down, it is because an organism is eating it as food. Preservatives work by making the food source inedible to these organisms. Properly preservative-treated wood can have 5 to 10 times the service life of untreated wood. This extension of life saves the equivalent of 12.5% of Canada’s annual log harvest. Preserved wood is used most often for railroad ties, utility poles, marine piles, decks, fences and other outdoor applications. Various treatment methods and types of chemicals are available, depending on the attributes required in the particular application and the level of protection needed.
Acoustics
Wood is composed of many small cellular tubes that are predominantly filled with air. The natural composition of the material allows for wood to act as an effective acoustical insulator and provides it with the ability to dampen vibrations. These sound-dampening characteristics allow for wood construction elements to be specified where sound insulation or amplification is required, such as libraries and auditoriums. Another important acoustical property of wood is its ability to limit impact noise transmission, an issue commonly associated with harder, more dense materials and construction systems. The use of topping or a built-up floating floor system overlaid on light wood frame or mass timber structural elements is a common approach to address acoustic separation between floors of a building. Depending on the type of materials in the built-up floor system, the topping can be applied directly to the wood structural members or over top of a moisture barrier or resilient layer. The use of gypsum board, absorptive (batt/loose-fill) insulation and resilient channels are also critical components of a wood-frame wall or floor assembly that also contribute to the acoustical performance of the overall assembly. Acoustic design considers a number of factors, including building location and orientation, as well as the insulation or separation of noise-producing functions and building elements. Sound Transmission Class (STC), Apparent Sound Transmission Class (ASTC) and Impact Insulation Class (IIC) ratings are used to establish the level of acoustic performance of building products and systems. The different ratings can be determined on the basis of standardized laboratory testing or, in the case of ASTC ratings, calculated using methodologies described in the NBC. Currently, the National Building Code of Canada (NBC) only regulates the acoustical design of interior wall and floor assemblies that separate dwelling units (e.g. apartments, houses, hotel rooms) from other units or other spaces in a building. The STC rating requirements for interior wall and floor assemblies are intended to limit the transmission of airborne noise between spaces. The NBC does not mandate any requirements for the control of impact noise transmission through floor assemblies. Footsteps and other impacts can cause severe annoyance in multifamily residences. Builders concerned about quality and reducing occupant complaints will ensure that floors are designed to minimize impact transmission. Beyond conforming to the minimum requirements of the NBC in residential occupancies, designers can also establish acoustic ratings for design of non-residential projects and specify materials and systems to ensure the building performs at that level. In addition to limiting transmission of airborne noise through internal structural walls and floors, flanking transmission of sound through perimeter joints and sound transmission through non-structural partition walls should also be considered during the acoustical design. Further information and requirements related to STC, ASTC and IIC ratings are provided in Appendix A of the NBC in sections A-9.10.3.1. and A-9.11.. This includes, inter alia, Tables 9.10.3.1-A and 9.10.3.1.-B that provide generic data on the STC ratings of different types of wood stud walls and STC and IIC ratings for different types of wood floor assemblies, respectively. Tables A-9.11.1.4.-A to A-9.11.1.4.-D present generic options for the design and construction of junctions between separating and flanking assemblies. Constructing according to these options is likely to meet or exceed an ASTC rating of 47 that is mandated by the NBC. Table A-Table 9.11.1.4. presents data about generic floor treatments that can be used to improve the flanking sound insulation performance of lightweight framed floors, i.e., additional layers of material over the subfloor (e.g. concrete topping, OSB or plywood) and finished flooring or coverings (e.g., carpet, engineered wood).
Adhesives
Adhesives can also be referred to as resins. Many engineered wood products, including finger-joined lumber, plywood, oriented strand board (OSB), glulam, cross-laminated timber (CLT), wood I-joists and other structural composite lumber products, require the use of adhesives to transfer the stresses between adjoining wood fibres. Waterproof adhesives and heat resistant adhesives are commonly used in the manufacture of structural wood products. Advances in adhesive technology to address challenges associated with increased production rates, visual appearance, process emissions and environmental impact concerns, have resulted in a wider range of innovative structural adhesive products. It is imperative that this new generation of adhesives achieve the same level of performance as traditional structural wood product adhesives such as phenol-formaldehyde (PF) or phenol-resorcinol formaldehyde (PRF). Examples of different structural wood product adhesives families include, but are not limited to: Emulsion polymer isocyanate (EPI); One-component polyurethane (PUR); Phenolic resins such as phenol-formaldehyde (PF) and phenol-resorcinol formaldehyde (PRF). Various types of extenders such as walnut shell flour, Douglas fir bark flour, alder bark flour, and wood flour are sometimes used to reduce cost, control penetration into the wood fibre or moderate strength properties for the specific materials being bonded. There are several industry standards that may be used to evaluate the performance of structural wood product adhesives, including: CSA O112.6 Phenol and phenol-resorcinol resin adhesives for wood (high-temperature curing) CSA O112.7 Resorcinol and phenol-resorcinol resin adhesives for wood (room- and intermediate-temperature curing) CSA O112.9 Evaluation of adhesives for structural wood products (exterior exposure) CSA O112.10 Evaluation of adhesives for structural wood products (limited moisture exposure) CAN/CSA O160 Formaldehyde emissions standard for composite wood products ASTM D7247 Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Shear Strength of Adhesive Bonds in Laminated Wood Products at Elevated Temperatures ASTM D7374 Standard Practice for Evaluating Elevated Temperature Performance of Adhesives Used in End-Jointed Lumber
Applying Treatment
Holes drilled to apply depot, supplementary or remedial treatments should be on vertical surfaces or undersides, where possible, to avoid creating additional routes for moisture entry. In the case of supplementary treatment, cut ends should be placed so they are not in ground contact where possible. Holes for treatment should not be drilled below ground level if it can possibly be avoided. All holes should be closed with a tight-fitting plug. Ideally this should be removable to allow re-treatment. Holes for water-soluble treatments should be placed in the right locations to intercept moisture close to its points of entry. Look carefully at the structure and think about moisture sources, water traps, moisture entry points, moisture flow and signs of moisture entry. Moisture sources include direct rainfall, diverted rainfall (via windows, cladding, balcony and walkway surfaces, roof overhangs, flashing, parapets, eavestroughs and downspouts), rain penetration of moisture barriers via nail holes, splits, failure of joints or deterioration of caulking, rain splash, blowing snow, ice dams, condensation, concrete foundations, soil contact, irrigation systems, drain and plumbing leaks. Water traps include metal “shoes”, V joints, checks, appressed boards, cupped horizontal surfaces and anywhere a rim is created at the edge of a horizontal surface. Accumulation of dirt and debris often indicates a water trap. Growth of algae also indicates locations where moisture hangs around longer after rain. Moisture entry points include all locations with end grain, around nails, screws and bolts plus any other holes or penetrations, checks and delaminations. Moisture flow in wood may be 100 to 1000 times faster along than across the grain. Patterns of moisture distribution in wood are therefore commonly elongated cones or lens shapes centred on the point of entry. Signs of moisture entry include swelling, darker colouration, fungal stain, iron stain around fasteners, nail popping and flaking of film-forming surface finishes. Confirmation of moisture contents conducive to decay can be made using electrical-resistance type moisture meters. Capacitance-type moisture meters may also be useful, but these can give erroneous results in the area of metal fittings. Click Here for more information of field treatment
Assessing and Restoration of Decay
Sometimes it happens – wood in service suffers from decay. How can you identify decayed wood and what are the recommended actions to take? First, be sure you actually have decay. The wood may only be harmlessly discoloured, for any number of reasons. See the publication in the side bar for help if your wood is stained but you’re not sure why. If wood is badly decayed, this will be quite obvious. The wood will be softer than normal and perhaps even be breakable by hand. Decayed wood often has a colour change, either darker or lighter than normal, although this could be due to weathering or could just be a stain. The wood may display an unexpected cracking pattern, or may look stringy- this is a sign of fairly advanced decay. If fungal growth is visible on the surface, the wood has quite likely already suffered strength loss even if this isn’t visibly obvious. However, do not rely on visual cues alone. Wood can appear stained and yet be sound, or can appear normal yet have already suffered significant strength loss due to decay. Some researchers or engineers use the pick test to determine if the wood is sound. They insert the point of a knife at a shallow angle to the surface and attempt to lever up a thin splinter. If the wood splinters with longer fragments, it is likely sound. If instead it breaks or crumbles in small pieces over the blade, it could be decayed. Decayed wood breaks somewhat like a carrot snapping in half, at one section, versus the splintering along the length of sound wood. See our Biodeterioration page to learn more about the science of decay. If you are still unsure whether or not you have decayed wood, you are advised to seek help from a wood restoration specialist. How urgent is a decay problem? By the time you notice decay, the wood typically has lost substantial strength already. In cases where the decayed wood is supporting load you are strongly advised to contact a structural engineer or other appropriate expert to more thoroughly assess the problem and proceed with a repair. A small, localized and non-critical case of decay may be a do-it-yourself project under some conditions. All decayed wood should be removed. If you are unable to remove the entire affected piece, remove the decayed portion plus an additional portion of adjacent wood beyond the visible decay. A rule of thumb is to remove an additional two feet (60 cm) of adjacent wood from each side, although this will of course depend on the extent of the decay. The removal of adjacent wood is because the fungus may have extended deep into the wood beyond the area of decay and may be ready to cause more damage in adjacent sound wood. Then apply a field treatment to the remaining adjacent wood, such as a borate solution in roll-on, rod or paste form, before replacing the removed pieces. Use treated or naturally durable wood to replace the removed pieces. If damaged wood must be left in place, a penetrating epoxy can sometimes be applied as a stabilizer. In those cases and for best results in all wood repair projects we recommend you consult with a wood restoration expert. Indoors, it is extremely important that you find the source(s) of the moisture that allowed wood decay fungi to grow. If you had wood decay in a location that is supposed to be dry, then you have a leak or a condensation problem that needs fixing to prevent any future problems. Look for primary and secondary sources of moisture. A short term leak may have allowed decay to start, for example, and condensation may be sustaining the decay. If the location of the decayed wood was outdoors or in a wet location, you need to use treated or naturally durable wood. If you have building moisture problems on a large scale, you need to hire some experts and be prepared for a potentially substantial remediation project. Seek out a qualified consultant, who will begin by using a variety of techniques and tools to determine the extent of the damage. This will include a visual examination for staining, bulging, cracking, presence of water, and warping. Subsurface moisture penetration will be tested with probes and/or thermography. In a building with wood structural members, the consultant will probably use a moisture meter to sample wetness of structural wood components in several locations. Based on the results of this investigation, the consultant will recommend a course of action for repair and future prevention. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation has developed a guide for building envelope rehabilitation, in two volumes: one for owners, one for consultants. More Information Click Here for a fact sheet Discolourations on wood products: Causes and Implications for help if your wood is stained and you’re not sure why. Click here for more information on biodeterioration and the science of decay. Click here for more information on remedial treatments. Click here for links on decay assessment and other durability topics
Bâtiments
Types de murs permettant de contrôler l’eau En règle générale, les experts en enveloppes de bâtiment considèrent qu’il existe trois ou quatre approches différentes pour la conception de murs au profit du contrôle de l’humidité. Les murs avec barrière d’étanchéité en surface sont conçus de façon à obtenir une étanchéité à l’eau et à l’air à la surface du parement. Un exemple de ceci serait le stuc appliqué directement sur le revêtement ou la maçonnerie, sans membrane d’étanchéité comme le papier de construction. Les joints entre le parement et les interfaces, et les autres composants, sont scellés afin d’assurer la continuité. La face extérieure du parement est la principale et unique voie d’évacuation de l’eau. Il n’y a pas de renfort pour le contrôle de l’humidité, c.-à-d. qu’il n’y a pas de système complémentaire. Un système d’étanchéisation en surface doit être construit et maintenu en parfaite condition afin de contrôler efficacement l’infiltration de l’eau de pluie. En général, ces murs sont recommandés uniquement dans les situations où les risques sont faibles, comme les zones murales situées sous de larges avant-toits ou là où le climat est sec. Les murs dotés d’une membrane dissimulée sont conçus dans la perspective où il est possible qu’un peu d’eau s’infiltre au-delà de la surface du parement. L’intérieur de ces murs comporte un dispositif d’évacuation de l’eau, en guise de deuxième ligne de défense contre l’eau de pluie. La face du parement reste la voie d’évacuation principale, mais une évacuation secondaire est exécutée à l’intérieur du mur. Le dispositif de drainage se compose d’une membrane comme du papier de construction, qui achemine l’eau jusqu’en bas et à l’extérieur du mur. Un bardage ou du stuc appliqué sur du papier de construction constitue un exemple d’un tel dispositif. Les murs comptant une membrane dissimulée sont appropriés aux endroits modérément exposés à la pluie et au vent. Les murs à écran pare-pluie vont un pas plus loin dans le contrôle de l’eau, en incorporant une cavité entre le dos du parement et le papier de construction. Le vide d’air ventile le dos du parement et l’aide à s’assécher. De plus, la cavité fait office de coupure capillaire entre le parement et le papier de construction, empêchant ainsi la majeure partie de l’eau d’entrer en contact avec le papier. Un mur avec stuc ou parement appliqué sur la fourrure verticale par-dessus le papier de construction constitue un bon exemple de mur à écran pare-pluie. De tels murs conviennent à des bâtiments fortement exposés à la pluie et au vent. L’écran pare-pluie à pression équilibrée constitue l’un des progrès de la technologie des écrans pare-pluie. Ces murs font appel à des orifices pour équilibrer la pression entre l’air extérieur et celui de la cavité, éliminant ainsi l’une des forces favorisant la pénétration de l’eau (lorsque celle-ci est poussée au travers des fissures en raison de la pression élevée à la surface du mur et de la pression basse dans la cavité). Ces murs sont réservés aux endroits où les risques d’exposition sont très élevés. Importance des avant-toits Lorsque le climat est pluvieux, un avant-toit constitue l’un des moyens les plus simples et efficaces de réduire le risque d’infiltration de l’eau. Un avant-toit peut être comparé à un parapluie pour les murs, et plus il est large, mieux c’est. Une étude sur les bâtiments aux prises avec des problèmes de fuites en Colombie-Britannique, demandée par la Société canadienne d’hypothèques et de logement en 1996, a démontré la forte corrélation inverse entre la largeur d’un avant-toit et le pourcentage de murs problématiques. Par contre, même un avant-toit étroit peut aider à protéger le mur, en grande partie en raison de son effet sur la pluie battante. L’un des avantages importants mésestimés des avant-toits et des toits à double pente est leur effet sur la pression du vent. En règle générale, la pluie poussée par le vent est la plus grande source d’humidité dans les murs. Un avant-toit ou une toiture inclinée aidera à rediriger le vent vers le haut et par-dessus le bâtiment, réduisant ainsi la pression sur le mur et, par conséquent, force de la pluie battante qui martèle le mur. L’eau sera donc moins susceptible d’être poussée par le vent dans les fissures du mur. Minimiser les orifices La grande majorité des problèmes causés par l’eau pluviale est attribuable à l’eau qui s’infiltre par les trous des murs. Si aucune mesure n’est prise pour remédier aux irrégularités de l’enveloppe, l’eau pourra s’infiltrer par exemple autour des cadrages de fenêtres et du conduit d’évacuation de la sécheuse, aux intersections comme les balcons et les parapets, et aux joints du papier de construction. Une conception détaillée et une construction soigneuse sont donc essentielles! Tout comme l’est l’entretien des éléments d’étanchéité de courte durée, comme le mastic de calfeutrage autour des cadrages de fenêtres. Le BC Housing-Homeowner Protection Office a mis à jour le « Best Practice Guide for Wood-Frame Envelopes in the Coastal Climate of British Columbia », initialement conçu par la Société canadienne d’hypothèques et de logement, et a publié le « Building Enclosure Design Guide for Wood-Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings », qui comprend des renseignements exhaustifs sur la conception et la construction. Utilisez notre calculatrice de résistance effective non seulement pour établir la résistance thermique des murs, mais également pour procéder à une évaluation de leur durabilité en fonction des conditions climatiques représentatives à l’échelle du Canada. Publications associées Pour obtenir des conseils en ligne sur la conception et la construction, consultez ce qui suit : Le programme « Build a Better Home », dirigé par l’APA – The Engineered Wood Association, anime des cours de formation, présente des maisons témoins et offre des publications. Le site Web fournit des renseignements sur la construction, de même que des liens vers toutes les publications pertinentes de l’APA. Building Enclosure Design Guide Guide: Wood-Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings.
Bolts
Bolts are widely used in wood construction. They are able to resist moderately heavy loads with relatively few connectors. Bolts may be used in wood-to-wood, wood-to-steel and wood-to-concrete connection types. Some typical structural applications for bolts include: purlin to beam connections beam to column connections column to base connections truss connections timber arches post and beam construction pole-frame construction timber bridges marine structures Several types of bolts as shown in Figure 5.10 below, are used for wood construction with the hexagon head type being the most common. Countersunk heads are used where a flush surface is desired. Carriage bolts can be tightened by turning the nut without holding the bolt since the shoulders under the head grip the wood. Bolts are commonly available in imperial diameters of 1/4, 1/2, 5/8, 3/4, 7/8 and 1 inch. Bolts are installed in holes drilled slightly (1 to 2 mm) larger than the bolt diameter to prevent any splitting and stress development that could be caused by installation or subsequent wood shrinkage. Depending on the diameter, bolts are available in lengths from 75 mm (3″) up to 400 mm (16″) with other lengths available on special order. Bolts can be dipped or plated, at an additional cost, to provide resistance to corrosion. In exposed conditions and high moisture environments, corrosion should be resisted by using hot dip galvanized or stainless steel bolts, washers and nuts. Washers are commonly used with bolts to keep the bolt head or nut from crushing the wood member when tightening is taking place. Washers are not required with a steel side plate, as the bolt head or nut bears directly on the steel. Common types of washers are shown in Figure 5.11 below. Design information provided in CWC’s Wood Design Manual is based on bolts conforming to the requirements of ASTM A307 Standard Specification for Carbon Steel Bolts, Studs, and Threaded Rod 60 000 PSI Tensile Strength or Grade 2 bolts and dowels as specified under SAE J429 Mechanical and Material Requirements for Externally Threaded Fasteners. Download Figure 5.10 (and 5.11) as a PDF.
Bridges
Timber bridges have a long history as vital components of the roadway, railway and logging road networks within Canada. Dependent on the availability of materials, technology, and labour, the design and construction of wood bridges has evolved significantly over the last 200 hundred years throughout North America. Wood bridges take on many forms and use alternative support systems; including simple span log bridges, different types of trussed bridges, and stress-laminated or composite bridge decks and components. Timber bridges remain an important part of our transportation network in Canada. The benefits of building modern timber bridges include: The different types of materials used to construct wood bridges include: sawn lumber, round logs, straight and curved glued-laminated timber (glulam), laminated veneer lumber (LVL), parallel strand lumber (PSL), cross-laminated timber (CLT), nail-laminated timber (NLT), and composite systems such as stress-laminated decks, wood-concrete laminated decks, and fibre-reinforced polymers. Two main wood species used for wood bridge construction in Canada are Douglas fir and the Spruce-Pine-Fir species combination. Other species within the Hem-Fir and Northern species combinations are also recognized under CSA O86, however, they are less commonly used in bridge construction. All metal fasteners used for bridges must be protected against corrosion. The most common method for providing protection is hot dip galvanizing, a process whereby a sacrificial metal is added to exterior of the fastener. Different fastener types that are used in wood bridge construction include, but are not limited to, bolts, lag screws, split rings, shear plates, and nails (for deck laminations only). All highway bridges in Canada must be designed to meet the requirements outlined in CSA S6 and CSA O86. The CSA S6 standard requires that the main structural components of any bridge in Canada, regardless of construction type, be able to withstand a minimum of 75 years of loading during its service life. The style and span of bridges varies greatly depending on the application. In hard to reach locations with deep valleys, timber trestle bridges were common at the end of the 19th century and into the beginning of the 20th century. Historically, trestle bridges relied heavily on ample timber resources and in some cases, were considered to be temporary. Initial construction of North America’s transcontinental railways would not have been possible without the use of timbers to construct bridges and trestles. Many examples of trussed timber bridges for have been built for well over a century. Trussed bridges allow for longer spans compared to simple girder bridges and historically had spans in the range of 30 to 60 m (100 to 200 ft). Bridges that are designed with trusses located above the deck provide a great opportunity to build a roof over the roadway. Installing a roof overhead is an excellent way to shed water away from the main bridge structure and protect it from the sun. The presence of these covered roofs is the main reason these century-old covered bridges remain in service today. The fact that they remain part of our landscape is as much a testament to their hardiness as to their attractiveness. Although originally devised as a rehabilitation measure for aging bridge decks, the stress-laminating technique has been extended to new bridges through the application of stressing at the time of original construction. Stress-laminated decks provide improved structural behaviour, through their excellent resistance to the effects of repeated loading. Three main considerations related to durability of wood bridges include protection by design, preservative treatment of wood, and replaceable elements. A bridge can be designed such that it is inherently self-protecting by deflecting water away from the structural elements. Preservative treated wood has the ability to resist the effects of de-icing chemicals and attack by biotic agents. Lastly, the bridge should be designed such that, at some point in its future, a single element can be replaced relatively easily, without significant disruption or cost. For further information, refer to the following resources: Wood Highway Bridges (Canadian Wood Council)Ontario Wood Bridge Reference Guide (Canadian Wood Council)CSA S6 Canadian Highway Bridge Design CodeCSA O86 Engineering design in wood
Bridges
Timber bridges have a long history as vital components of the roadway, railway and logging road networks within Canada. Dependent on the availability of materials, technology, and labour, the design and construction of wood bridges has evolved significantly over the last 200 hundred years throughout North America. Wood bridges take on many forms and use alternative support systems; including simple span log bridges, different types of trussed bridges, and stress-laminated or composite bridge decks and components. Timber bridges remain an important part of our transportation network in Canada. The benefits of building modern timber bridges include: reduced initial cost, particularly for remote areas; speed of construction, through the use of prefabrication; sustainability advantages; aesthetics; lighter foundations; lower earthquake loads, coupled with less complex connections to substructures; smaller temporary structures and cranes; and lower transportation costs associated with lower weight materials. The different types of materials used to construct wood bridges include: sawn lumber, round logs, straight and curved glued-laminated timber (glulam), laminated veneer lumber (LVL), parallel strand lumber (PSL), cross-laminated timber (CLT), nail-laminated timber (NLT), and composite systems such as stress-laminated decks, wood-concrete laminated decks, and fibre-reinforced polymers. Two main wood species used for wood bridge construction in Canada are Douglas fir and the Spruce-Pine-Fir species combination. Other species within the Hem-Fir and Northern species combinations are also recognized under CSA O86, however, they are less commonly used in bridge construction. All metal fasteners used for bridges must be protected against corrosion. The most common method for providing protection is hot dip galvanizing, a process whereby a sacrificial metal is added to exterior of the fastener. Different fastener types that are used in wood bridge construction include, but are not limited to, bolts, lag screws, split rings, shear plates, and nails (for deck laminations only). All highway bridges in Canada must be designed to meet the requirements outlined in CSA S6 and CSA O86. The CSA S6 standard requires that the main structural components of any bridge in Canada, regardless of construction type, be able to withstand a minimum of 75 years of loading during its service life. The style and span of bridges varies greatly depending on the application. In hard to reach locations with deep valleys, timber trestle bridges were common at the end of the 19th century and into the beginning of the 20th century. Historically, trestle bridges relied heavily on ample timber resources and in some cases, were considered to be temporary. Initial construction of North America’s transcontinental railways would not have been possible without the use of timbers to construct bridges and trestles. Many examples of trussed timber bridges for have been built for well over a century. Trussed bridges allow for longer spans compared to simple girder bridges and historically had spans in the range of 30 to 60 m (100 to 200 ft). Bridges that are designed with trusses located above the deck provide a great opportunity to build a roof over the roadway. Installing a roof overhead is an excellent way to shed water away from the main bridge structure and protect it from the sun. The presence of these covered roofs is the main reason these century-old covered bridges remain in service today. The fact that they remain part of our landscape is as much a testament to their hardiness as to their attractiveness. Although originally devised as a rehabilitation measure for aging bridge decks, the stress-laminating technique has been extended to new bridges through the application of stressing at the time of original construction. Stress-laminated decks provide improved structural behaviour, through their excellent resistance to the effects of repeated loading. Three main considerations related to durability of wood bridges include protection by design, preservative treatment of wood, and replaceable elements. A bridge can be designed such that it is inherently self-protecting by deflecting water away from the structural elements. Preservative treated wood has the ability to resist the effects of de-icing chemicals and attack by biotic agents. Lastly, the bridge should be designed such that, at some point in its future, a single element can be replaced relatively easily, without significant disruption or cost. For further information, refer to the following resources: Wood Highway Bridges (Canadian Wood Council) Ontario Wood Bridge Reference Guide (Canadian Wood Council) CSA S6 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code CSA O86 Engineering design in wood
Buildings
Wall Types for Water Control Building envelope experts generally speak of three or four different approaches to design of a wall for moisture control. Face seal walls are designed to achieve water tightness and air tightness at the face of the cladding. An example would be stucco applied directly to sheathing or masonry without a moisture barrier membrane such as building paper. Joints in the cladding and interfaces with other wall components are sealed to provide continuity. The exterior face of the cladding is the primary – and only – drainage path. There is no moisture control redundancy, i.e., there is no back-up system. A face seal system must be constructed and maintained in perfect condition to effectively control rain water intrusion. In general, these walls are only recommended in low risk situations, such as wall areas under deep overhangs or in dry climates. Concealed barrier walls are designed with an acceptance that some water may pass beyond the surface of the cladding. These walls incorporate a drainage plane within the wall assembly, as a second line of defense against rain water. The face of the cladding remains the primary drainage path, but secondary drainage is accomplished within the wall. This drainage plane consists of a membrane such as building paper, which carries water down and out of the wall assembly. An example is siding or stucco applied over building paper. Concealed barrier walls are appropriate in areas of low to moderate exposure to rain and wind. Rainscreen walls take water management one step further by incorporating a cavity between the back of the cladding and the building paper. This airspace ventilates the back of the cladding, helping it to dry out. The cavity also acts as a capillary break between cladding and building paper, thereby keeping most water from making contact with the building paper. An example of a rainscreen wall is stucco or siding applied to vertical strapping over the building paper. Rainscreen walls are appropriate in high rain and wind exposures. An advancement of the rainscreen technology is the pressure-equalized rainscreen. These walls use vents to equalize the pressure between the exterior and the cavity air, thereby removing one of the driving forces for water penetration (when it is pushed through cracks due to high pressure on the face of the wall and low pressure in the cavity). These walls are for very high risk exposures. Importance of an Overhang In a rainy climate, an overhang is one of the simplest and most effective ways to reduce the risk of water intrusion. An overhang is an umbrella for the wall, and the deeper the better. A survey of leaky buildings in British Columbia commissioned by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation in 1996 showed a strong inverse correlation between depth of overhang and percent of walls with problems. However, even a small overhang can help protect the wall, largely due to its effect on driving rain. One important benefit of overhangs and peaked roofs often not appreciated is the effect of these elements on wind pressure. Wind-driven rain is typically the largest source of moisture for walls. An overhang and/or sloped roof will help direct the wind up and over the building, which reduces the pressure on the wall and thereby reduces the force of the driving rain striking the wall. This means water is less likely to be pushed by wind through cracks in the wall. Minimize the Holes Most rainwater problems are due to water leaking into the wall through holes. If care isn’t taken to protect discontinuities in the envelope, water can leak around window framing and dryer vents, at intersections like balconies and parapets, and at building paper joints, for example. Good design detailing and careful construction is critical! So is maintenance of short-life sealants like caulk around window frames. BC Housing-Homeowner Protection Office has updated the “Best Practice Guide for Wood-Frame Envelopes in the Coastal Climate of British Columbia” originally developed by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation and published “Building Enclosure Design Guide for Wood-Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings” with extensive information on design and construction detailing. Use our Effective R calculator to determine not only the thermal resistance of walls, but also a durability assessment of the wall based on representative climate conditions across Canada. Related Publications For on-line design and construction tips, try the following:The Build a Better Home program, operated by APA-The Engineered Wood Association, runs training courses, operates a demonstration houses, and offers publications. The web site offers construction information and provides links to all relevant APA publications. Building Enclosure Design Guide: Wood-Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings.
Canadian Preservation Industry
Canada has had a wood preservation industry for about 100 years. Canada is tied with the UK as the world’s second largest producer of treated wood (the USA is first, by a large margin). In 1999, the most recent year for which we have data, Canada produced 3.5 million cubic metres of treated wood. There are about 65 treating plants in Canada. As with most other industrialized countries, Canada developed a wood preservation industry using creosote, initially to service railroads (the ties holding the rails) and then utilities (power poles). Creosote production began declining by the 1950s, and by the 1970s was being somewhat replaced for these traditional uses by pentachlorophenol. Today, these oil-borne preservatives only constitute 17% of Canadian treated wood production. The remaining 83% of production uses water-borne preservatives such as CCA, ACQ and CA. The industry began its substantial shift to the water-borne products in the 1970s, as consumer interest in decks and other residential outdoor structures dramatically increased. For many years, CCA was by far the dominant preservative for both residential and industrial applications. In 2004, CCA regulations were changed such that CCA is no longer available for many residential applications. Subsequently, Canadian treaters have shifted about 80% of their previous CCA production to ACQ or CA. Most of Canada’s treated wood is used domestically; Canada exports only 10% of its production. Canada has its own wood preservation standards, supports several technical and marketing organizations, and maintains a lead position in certain areas of wood preservation research. A major focus of the industry has been in response to increasing levels of health and environmental protection regulations.
Canadian Species
Canadian species of visually graded lumber There are more than a hundred softwood species in North America. To simplify the supply and use of structural softwood lumber, species having similar strength characteristics, and typically grown in the same region, are combined. Having a smaller number of species combinations makes it easier to design and select an appropriate species and for installation and inspection on the job site. In contrast, non-structural wood products are graded solely on the basis of appearance quality and are typically marked and sold under an individual species (e.g., Eastern White Pine, Western Red Cedar). The Spruce-Pine-Fir (S-P-F) species group grows abundantly throughout Canada and makes up by far the largest proportion of dimension lumber production. The other major commercial species groups for Canadian dimension lumber are Douglas Fir-Larch, Hem-Fir and Northern Species. The four species groups of Canadian lumber and their characteristics are shown below. Species Combination: Douglas Fir-Larch Abbreviation: D.Fir-L or DF-L Species Included in Combination Growth Region Douglas Fir Western Larch Characteristics Colour Ranges Reddish brown to yellow High degree of hardness Good resistance to decay Species Combination: Hem-Fir Abbreviation: Hem-Fir or H-F Species Included in Combination Growth Region Pacific Coast Hemlock Amabilis Fir Characteristics Colour Ranges Yellow brown to white Works easily Takes paint well Holds nails well Good gluing characteristics Species Combination: Spruce-Pine-Fir Abbreviation: S-P-F Species Included in Combination Growth Region White Spruce Engleman Spruce Red Spruce Black Spruce Jack Pine Lodgepole Pine Balsam Fir Alpine Fir Characteristics Colour Ranges White to pale yellow Works easily Takes paint well Holds nails well Good gluing charateristics Species Combination: Northern Species Abbreviation: North or Nor Species Included in Combination Growth Region Western Red Cedar Characteristics Colour Ranges Reddish brown heartwood, light sapwood Exceptional resistance to decay Moderate strength High in appearance qualities Works easily Takes fine finishes Lowest shrinkage Also Included in Northern Species Species Included in Combination Growth Region Red Pine Characteristics Colour Ranges Works easily Also Included in Northern Species Species Included in Combination Growth Region Ponderosa Pine Characteristics Colour Ranges Takes finishes well Holds nails well Holds screws well Seasons with little checking or cupping Also Included in Northern Species Species Included in Combination Growth Region Western White Pine Eastern White Pine Characteristics Colour Ranges Creamy white to light straw brown heartwood, almost white sapwood Works easily Finishes well Doeasnât tend to split or splinter Holds nails well Low shrinkage Takes stain, paints & varnishes well Also Included in Northern Species Species Included in Combination Growth Region Trembling Aspen Largetooth Aspen Balsam Poplar Characteristics Colour Ranges Works easily Finishes well Holds nails well Below is a map of the forest regions in Canada and the principal tree species that grow in each region. Click to enlarge the map. This map appears courtesy of Natural Resources Canada.
