Choose Your Language

Climate Change

Concerns about climate change are encouraging decarbonization of the building sector, including the use of construction materials responsible for fewer greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and improvements in operational performance over the life cycle of buildings. Accounting for over 10 percent of total GHG emissions in Canada, the building sector plays an important role in climate change mitigation and adaptation. Decreasing the climate change impacts of buildings offers high environmental returns for relatively low economic investment. The Government of Canada, as a signatory to the Paris Agreement, has committed to reducing Canada’s GHG emissions by 30 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. In addition, the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change acknowledges that forest and wood products have the ability to contribute to the national emissions reductions strategy through: enhancing carbon storage in forests; increasing the use of wood for construction; generating fuel from bioenergy and bioproducts; and advancing innovation in bio-based product development and forest management practices. The importance of the forestry and wood products sector as a critical component toward mitigating the effects of climate change is also echoed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); stating that a sustainable forest management strategy aimed at maintaining or increasing forest carbon stocks while producing timber, fibre, or energy, generates the largest sustained benefit to mitigate climate change. In addition, the IPCC proclaims that “mitigating options by the forest sector include extending carbon retention in HWP [harvested wood products], product substitution, and producing biomass for bioenergy.” The Canadian forest industry is pledging to remove 30 megatons of carbon dioxide (CO2) a year by 2030, equivalent to 13 percent of Canada’s national commitments under the Paris Agreement. Several mechanisms will be employed to meet this challenge, including: product displacement, using bio-based products in place of fossil fuel-derived products and energy sources; forest management practices, including increased utilization, improved residue use and land use planning, and better growth and yields; accounting for long-lived bio-based product carbon pools; and higher efficiencies in wood product manufacturing processes Canada is home to 9 percent of the world’s forests, which have the ability to act as enormous carbon sinks by absorbing and storing carbon. Annually, Canada harvests less than one-half of one percent of its forest land, allowing for the forest cover in Canada to remain constant for last century. Sustainable forest management and legal requirements for reforestation continue to maintain this vast carbon reservoir. A forest is a natural system that is considered carbon neutral as long as it is managed sustainably, which means it must be reforested after harvest and not converted to other land uses. Canada has some of the strictest forest management regulations in the world, requiring successful regeneration after public forests are harvested. When managed with stewardship, forests are a renewable resource that will be available for future generations. Canada is also a world leader in voluntary third-party forest certification, adding further assurance of sustainable forest management. Sustainable forest management programs and certification schemes strive to preserve the quantity and quality of forests for future generations, respect the biological diversity of the forests and the ecology of the species living within it, and respect the communities affected by the forests. Canadian companies have achieved third-party certification on over 150 million hectares (370 million acres) of forests, the largest area of certified forests in the world. The forest represents one carbon pool, storing biogenic carbon in soils and trees. The carbon remains stored until the trees die and decay or burn. When a tree is cut, 40 to 60 percent of the biogenic carbon remains in the forest; the rest is removed as logs and much of it is transferred to the wood products carbon pool within the built environment. Wood products continue to store this biogenic carbon, often for decades in the case of wood buildings, delaying or preventing the release of CO2 emissions. Wood products and building systems have ability to store large amounts of carbon; 1 m3 of S-P-F lumber stores approximately 1 tonne of CO2 equivalent. The amount of carbon stored within a wood product is directly proportional the density of the wood. The average single-family home in Canada stores almost 30 tonnes of CO2 equivalent within the wood products used for its construction. Most bio-based construction products actually store more carbon in the wood fibre than is released during the harvesting, manufacturing and transportation stages of their life cycle. In general, bio-based products like wood that are naturally grown with help from the sun have lower embodied emissions. The embodied emissions arise through the production processes of building materials, starting with resource extraction or harvesting through manufacturing, transportation, construction, and end-of-life. Bioenergy produced from bio-based residuals, such as tree bark and sawdust, is primarily used to generate energy for the manufacture of wood products in North America. Wood construction products have low embodied GHG emissions because they are grown using renewable solar energy, use little fossil fuel energy during manufacturing, and have many end-of-life options (reuse, recycle, energy recovery). Wood products have the ability to substitute for other more carbon-intensive building materials and energy sources. GHG emissions are thereby avoided by using wood products instead of other more GHG-intensive building products. Displacement factors (kg CO2 avoided per kg wood used) have been estimated to calculate the amount of carbon avoided through the use of wood products in building construction.   For further information, refer to the following resources: Addressing Climate Change in the Building Sector – Carbon Emissions Reductions (Canadian Wood Council) Resilient and Adaptive Design Using Wood (Canadian Wood Council) CWC Carbon Calculator Canada’s Forest Products Industry “30 by 30” Climate Change Challenge (Forest Products Association of Canada) www.naturallywood.com www.thinkwood.com Building with wood = Proactive climate protection (Binational Softwood Lumber Council and State University of New York) Natural Resources Canada Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change (Government of Canada) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Life Cycle Assessment

Construction products and the building sector as a whole have significant impacts on the environment. Policy instruments and market forces are increasingly pushing governments and businesses to document and report environmental impacts and track improvements. One tool that is available to help understand the environmental aspects related to new construction, renovation, and retrofits of buildings and civil engineering works is life cycle assessment (LCA). LCA is a decision-making tool that can help to identify design and construction approaches that yield improved environmental performance. Several European jurisdictions, including Germany, Zurich and Brussels, have made LCA a mandatory requirement prior to issuing a building permit. In addition, the application of LCA to building design and materials selection is a component of green building rating systems. LCA can benefit manufacturers, architects, builders, and government agencies by providing quantitative information about potential environmental impacts and providing data to identify areas for improvement. LCA is a performance-based approach to assessing the environmental aspects related to building design and construction. LCA can be used to understand the potential environmental impacts of a product or structure at every stage of its life; from resource extraction or raw material acquisition, transportation, processing and manufacturing, construction, operation, maintenance and renovation to the end-of-life. LCA is an internationally accepted, science-based methodology which has existed in alternative forms since the 1960s. The requirements and guidance for conducting LCA has been established through international consensus standards; ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. LCA considers all input and output flows (materials, energy, resources) associated with a given product system and is an iterative procedure that includes goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, impact assessment, and interpretation. The inventory analysis, also known as the life cycle inventory (LCI), consists of data collection and the tracking of all input and output flows within a product system. Publicly available LCI databases, such as the U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database, are accessible free of charge in order to source this LCI data. During the impact assessment phase of the LCA, the LCI flows are translated into potential environmental impact categories using theoretical and empirical environmental modelling techniques. LCA is able to quantify potential environmental impacts and aspects of a product, such as: Global warming potential; Acidification potential; Eutrophication potential; Ozone depletion potential; Smog potential; Primary energy consumption; Material resources consumption; and Hazardous and non-hazardous waste generation. LCA tools are available to building designers that are publicly accessible and user friendly. These tools allow designers to rapidly obtain potential environmental impact information for an extensive range of generic building assemblies or develop full building life cycle assessments on their own. LCA software offers building professionals powerful tools for calculating the potential life cycle impacts of building products or assemblies and performing environmental comparisons. It is also possible to use LCA to perform objective comparisons between alternate materials, assemblies and whole buildings, measured over the respective life cycles and based on quantifiable environmental indicators. LCA enables comparison of the environmental trade-offs associated with choosing one material or design solution over another and, as a result, provides an effective basis for comparing relative environmental implications of alternative building design scenarios. An LCA that examines alternative design options must ensure functional equivalence. Each design scenario considered, including the whole building, must meet building code requirements and offer a minimum level of technical performance or functional equivalence. For something as complex as a building, this means tracking and tallying the environmental inputs and outputs for the multitude of assemblies, subassemblies and components in each design option. The longevity of a building system also impacts the environmental performance. Wood buildings can remain in service for long periods of time if they are designed, built and maintained properly. Numerous LCA studies worldwide have demonstrated that wood building products and systems can yield environmental advantages over other building materials and methods of construction. FPInnovations conducted a LCA of a four-storey building in Quebec constructed using cross-laminated timber (CLT). The study assessed how the CLT design would compare with a functionally equivalent concrete and steel building of the same floor area, and found improved environmental performance in two of six impact categories, and equivalent performance in the rest. In addition, at the end-of-life, bio-based products have the ability to become part of a subsequent product system when reused, recycled or recovered for energy; potentially reducing environmental impacts and contributing to the circular economy. Life cycle of wood construction products Photo source: CEI-Bois For further information, refer to the following resources: www.naturallywood.com Athena Sustainable Materials Institute Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability (BEES) FPInnovations. A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Two Multistory Residential Buildings: Cross-Laminated Timber vs. Concrete Slab and Column with Light Gauge Steel Walls, 2013. American Wood Council U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database ISO 14040 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework ISO 14044 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines

Codes & Standards

BUILDING CODES & STANDARDS (THE REGULATORY SYSTEM) The construction industry is regulated through building codes which are informed by: Design standards that provide information on “how to” build with wood, Product standards that define the characteristics of the wood products that can be used in design standards, and Test standards that set out the methodology for establishing a wood product’s characteristics CWC is active in a technical capacity in all areas of the Regulatory System. This includes: BUILDING CODES – CWC participates extensively in the development process of the Building Codes in Canada. CWC is a member of both National and Provincial Building Code Committees. These Committees are balanced and representation is limited to about 25 members on each Committee. Competing interests (i.e. steel and concrete) sit on the same Committees. This is an arena where CWC can win or lose ground for members’ products. DESIGN STANDARDS – Each producer of structural materials develops engineering design standards that provide information on how to use their products in buildings. CWC holds the Secretariat for Canada’s wood design standard (CSA O86 “Engineering Design in Wood”), providing both technical expertise and administrative support for its development. CWC is also a member of the American Wood Council (AWC) committee that is responsible for the U.S. National Design Specification for wood design. PRODUCT STANDARDS – CWC is involved in the development of Canadian, U.S. and international standards for its wood building product producers. TEST STANDARDS – CWC is involved in developing Canadian, U.S. and international test standards in areas that affect wood products, such as fire performance. Detailed building codes & standards pages: Acoustics Combustible construction Encapsulated mass timber construction Energy Code National Fire Code National Model Codes in Canada Wood design in the National Building Code of Canada Wood in non-combustible buildings Wood Standards CSA O86 Engineering design in wood CSA S-6 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code CSA S406 Permanent Wood Foundations CSA 080 Wood Preservation

Fire Code

National Fire Code of Canada The National Building Code of Canada (NBC) and the National Fire Code of Canada (NFC), both published by the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) and developed by the Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes (CCBFC), are developed as companion documents. The NBC establishes minimum standards for the health and safety of the occupants of new buildings. It also applies to the alteration of existing buildings, including changes in occupancy. The NBC is not retroactive. That is, a building constructed in conformance with a particular edition of the NBC, which is in effect at the time of its construction, is not automatically required to conform to the subsequent edition of the NBC. That building would only be required to conform to an updated version of the NBC if it were to undergo a change in occupancy or alterations which invoke the application of the new NBC in effect at the time of the change in occupancy or major alteration. The NFC addresses fire safety during the operation of facilities and buildings. The requirements in the NFC, on the other hand, are intended to ensure the level of safety initially provided by the NBC is maintained. With this objective, the NFC regulates: the conduct of activities causing fire hazards the maintenance of fire safety equipment and egress facilities limitations on building content, including the storage and handling of hazardous products the establishment of fire safety plans The NFC is intended to be retroactive with respect to fire alarm, standpipe and sprinkler systems. In 1990, the NFC was revised to clarify that such systems “shall be provided in all buildings where required by and in conformance with the requirements of the National Building Code of Canada.” This ensures that buildings are adequately protected against the inherent risk at the same level as the NBC would require for a new building. It does not concern other fire protection features such as smoke control measures or firefighter’s elevators. The NFC also ensures that changes in building use do not increase the risk beyond the limits of the original fire protection systems. The NBC and the NFC are written to minimize the possibility of conflict in their respective contents. Both must be considered when constructing, renovating or maintaining buildings. They are complementary, in that the NFC takes over from the NBC once the building is in operation. In addition, older structures which do not conform to the most current level of fire safety can be made safer through the requirements of the NFC. The most recent significant changes in the NFC relate the construction of six-storey buildings using combustible construction. As a result, eight additional protection measures related to mid-rise combustible buildings have been added to address fire hazards during construction when fire protection features are not yet in place.

Energy Code

The National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings (NECB) aims to help save on energy bills, reduce peak energy demand, and improve the quality and comfort of the building’s indoor environment. Through each code development cycle, the NECB intends to implement a tiered approach toward Canada’s goal for new buildings, as presented in the “Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change”, of achieving ‘Net Zero Energy Ready’ buildings by 2030. The NECB is available for free online; published by the National Research Council (NRC) and developed by the Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes in collaboration with Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). CWC maintains ongoing participation in the development and updating of the NECB. The NECB sets out technical requirements for energy efficient design and construction and outlines the minimum energy efficiency levels for code compliance of all new buildings. The NECB applies to all building types, except housing and small buildings, which are addressed under Clause 9.36 of the National Building Code of Canada. The NECB offers three compliance paths: prescriptive, trade-off and performance. The most cost-effective time to incorporate energy efficiency measures into a building is during the initial design and construction phase. It is much more expensive to retrofit later. This is particularly true for the building envelope, which includes exterior walls, windows, doors and roofing. The NECB addresses considerations such as air infiltration rates (air leakage) and thermal transmission of heat through the building envelope. Considering the different climate zones in Canada, the NECB also provides requirements related to maximum overall (effective) thermal transmittance for above-ground opaque wall assemblies and effective thermal resistance of assemblies in contact with ground, e.g., permanent wood foundations. In addition, the NECB specifies the maximum fenestration and door to wall ratio based on the climate zone in which the building in located. As energy efficiency requirements for buildings are increased, wood is a natural solution to pair with other insulating and weatherizing materials to develop buildings with high operational energy performance and provide consistent indoor comfort for occupants. For further information on the NECB, visit the Codes Canada at the National Research Council Canada.

Acoustics

Wood is composed of many small cellular tubes that are predominantly filled with air. The natural composition of the material allows for wood to act as an effective acoustical insulator and provides it with the ability to dampen vibrations. These sound-dampening characteristics allow for wood construction elements to be specified where sound insulation or amplification is required, such as libraries and auditoriums. Another important acoustical property of wood is its ability to limit impact noise transmission, an issue commonly associated with harder, more dense materials and construction systems. The use of topping or a built-up floating floor system overlaid on light wood frame or mass timber structural elements is a common approach to address acoustic separation between floors of a building. Depending on the type of materials in the built-up floor system, the topping can be applied directly to the wood structural members or over top of a moisture barrier or resilient layer. The use of gypsum board, absorptive (batt/loose-fill) insulation and resilient channels are also critical components of a wood-frame wall or floor assembly that also contribute to the acoustical performance of the overall assembly. Acoustic design considers a number of factors, including building location and orientation, as well as the insulation or separation of noise-producing functions and building elements. Sound Transmission Class (STC), Apparent Sound Transmission Class (ASTC) and Impact Insulation Class (IIC) ratings are used to establish the level of acoustic performance of building products and systems. The different ratings can be determined on the basis of standardized laboratory testing or, in the case of ASTC ratings, calculated using methodologies described in the NBC. Currently, the National Building Code of Canada (NBC) only regulates the acoustical design of interior wall and floor assemblies that separate dwelling units (e.g. apartments, houses, hotel rooms) from other units or other spaces in a building. The STC rating requirements for interior wall and floor assemblies are intended to limit the transmission of airborne noise between spaces. The NBC does not mandate any requirements for the control of impact noise transmission through floor assemblies. Footsteps and other impacts can cause severe annoyance in multifamily residences. Builders concerned about quality and reducing occupant complaints will ensure that floors are designed to minimize impact transmission. Beyond conforming to the minimum requirements of the NBC in residential occupancies, designers can also establish acoustic ratings for design of non-residential projects and specify materials and systems to ensure the building performs at that level. In addition to limiting transmission of airborne noise through internal structural walls and floors, flanking transmission of sound through perimeter joints and sound transmission through non-structural partition walls should also be considered during the acoustical design. Further information and requirements related to STC, ASTC and IIC ratings are provided in Appendix A of the NBC in sections A-9.10.3.1. and A-9.11.. This includes, inter alia, Tables 9.10.3.1-A and 9.10.3.1.-B that provide generic data on the STC ratings of different types of wood stud walls and STC and IIC ratings for different types of wood floor assemblies, respectively. Tables A-9.11.1.4.-A to A-9.11.1.4.-D present generic options for the design and construction of junctions between separating and flanking assemblies. Constructing according to these options is likely to meet or exceed an ASTC rating of 47 that is mandated by the NBC. Table A-Table 9.11.1.4. presents data about generic floor treatments that can be used to improve the flanking sound insulation performance of lightweight framed floors, i.e., additional layers of material over the subfloor (e.g. concrete topping, OSB or plywood) and finished flooring or coverings (e.g., carpet, engineered wood).

Durability by treatment

Treating Methods There are two basic methods of treating: with and without pressure. Non-pressure methods are the application of preservative by brushing, spraying or dipping the piece to be treated. These are superficial treatments that do not result in deep penetration or large absorption of preservative. Their use is best restricted to field treatment during construction (for example, when a pressure-treated piece of lumber must be field cut), to cases where only part of a piece is to be treated, to manufacturing processes for strand-based wood products, to surface protection against moulds or to remedial treatment of wood in place. For example, mixtures of borate and glycols are used to treat sound wood left in place during repair of decay problems. The glycol helps the borate to penetrate dry wood, arresting the activity of any fungus which contacts it. The penetration of the preservative is still limited, and the most important function is to prevent undetected fungus left in place from spreading to sound wood. Deeper, more thorough penetration is achieved by driving the preservative into the wood cells with pressure. Various combinations of pressure and vacuum are used to force adequate levels of chemical into the wood. Pressure-treating preservatives consist of chemicals carried in a solvent. The solvent, or carrier, is either water or oil. Oilborne preservatives are largely used for treating industrial products such as railway ties, utility poles and bridge timbers, and for protection of field cuts. Waterborne preservatives are more widely used in residential markets due to the absence of odour, the cleaner wood surface and the ability to paint or stain the wood product. When a wood product will be used in an application known to present a risk, for example outdoors, pressure-treatment is recommended. Types of Preservatives The mostly commonly used wood preservatives in North America for residential construction are waterborne copper-based systems, including alkaline copper quaternary (ACQ), copper azole (CA) and micronized copper azole (MCA). Wood treated with these preservatives has a natural green hue, though this may be masked by the use of colourants that most often give the treated wood a mid-brown colour. Copper is the primary biocide in these systems. ACQ also contains quaternary ammonium compounds that act as a co-biocide to protect against copper-tolerant organisms. Similarly, CA and MCA contain tebuconazole to protect against these organisms.  Chromated copper arsenate (CCA) was heavily used in residential construction until 2004 when its use in most residential applications was phased out. It is now largely limited to industrial applications, but can still be used in a few residential applications such as shakes and shingles and permanent wood foundations. Ammoniacal copper zinc arsenate (ACZA) can also be used in most of these applications, but is primarily favoured for treating Douglas-fir and for marine applications. Borates are another class of waterborne preservative used in North America. Their use is currently limited to applications which are protected from rain and other persistent sources of water. These include framing in termite areas and repair of decayed framing in leaky buildings where the main moisture source has been eliminated. Borates are also used as part of a dual treatment in conjunction with a creosote or copper naphthenate shell to protect railway ties. Metal-free waterborne preservative systems such as PTI and EL2 contain carbon-based fungicides and insecticides. Wood treated with these systems is used in residential construction in the United States, and is restricted to above-ground applications. Oilborne preservatives include creosote, pentachlorphenol, and copper- and zinc-naphthenate. Creosote is the well-known black oily wood preservative, the oldest type of preservative still in modern use. It’s now used in Canada almost exclusively for railroad ties, where its resistance to moisture movement is a key advantage. Pentachlorophenol in oil is mainly used for utility poles where the surface softening characteristics of the oil are useful in pole climbing. Copper naphthenate and zinc naphthenate are two common preservatives used for treating field cuts. Copper naphthenate is also used to treat ties and timbers in the United States. Thermal Modification The properties of wood are altered when it is exposed to high temperatures (160-260°C) under reduced oxygen conditions. Thermal modification kilns use much higher temperatures than drying kilns, and use steam (or other oxygen-excluding media) to protect the wood from degradation at these high temperatures. The resulting thermally modified wood generally has a darker colour, increased dimensional stability, and increased decay resistance. Thermal modification may reduce some mechanical properties and does not protect wood against insects. Thermally modified wood is typically used in non-structural, above-ground applications, such as siding, decking and outdoor furniture. More information from Producers of Wood Preservative Products Lonza Wood Protection Timber Specialties  Viance LLC  Genics Inc.  Kop-Coat   Rio Tinto Minerals Nisus   Creosote council   KMG Chemicals   Wood Preservation Canada  

Finishing Exterior Wood

The appearance of wood can be modified with the application of an architectural coating. Architectural coatings are surface coverings such as paints and stains applied to a building or exterior structures such as a deck. Coatings are multi-functional: decorative, reduce the effort needed to clean buildings and structures, and provide protection against moisture uptake and helping extend the life of wood. However, coatings cannot be considered as substitutes for preservative treatment. On this page, we explain the basics of different types of exterior wood coatings, and what they can and can’t do for wood. Types of Coatings – Opacity Architectural coatings available for wood generally include paints, stains, varnishes and water repellents. There are a number of ways to classify coatings. One common method is to differentiate based on appearance. Coatings are often identified as: 1) Opaque; 2) semi-transparent or 3) transparent.  These terms indicate how much of the natural wood features will be visible through the finish.  An opaque coating doesn’t allow any of the wood’s natural colour to show through and depending on thickness may also hide much or all of its surface texture. It effectively protects the wood from damage caused by sunlight. It can also help keep moisture out of the wood.  These coatings tend to last the longest. Opaque coatings include paints and solid colour stains. A transparent or semi-transparent finish such as a stain or water repellent may change the colour of the wood, but because it allows the grain and texture to show through, the wood still looks “natural.”  These finishes help keep moisture out of the wood to some extent but there is considerable variation between stains in their ability to restrict moisture ingress. They also help protect the wood from sunlight damage to varying degrees depending on their content of organic UV absorbers or inorganic pigments. The difference between transparent and semi-transparent coatings is also sometimes unclear.  Transparent coatings allow more grain and texture to show through. Transparent exterior coatings labeled as “clear” may still contain some pigment to enhance wood’s natural colour and provide a visual distinction between painted and unpainted areas during application. However, it is important to note that clear products intended for interior use only are NOT appropriate for exterior use, as they will quickly degrade and fail if exposed to sunlight and weather. There are many transparent products marketed as providing water protection for wood (water repellents) – these might technically be considered wood “treatments” rather than wood coatings as they mainly provide water protection and help reduce checking (splitting), and provide very limited, if any, UV protection.  This means they usually fail earlier than pigmented finishes, but they do help slow down the weathering process by restricting water ingress.  Note that water repellents are often solvent-borne and contain wax which affects the adhesion of subsequent coatings, which means most of these products should not be used as a pre-treatment beneath paint.  However, transparent water repellents have the unique benefit of being the most aesthetically-forgiving treatment when there is lack of maintenance.  In other words, these products don’t change the colour of the wood, so bare patches of wood are not as visible if the coating wears away. Types of Coatings – Carriers Another common way of categorizing coatings is by the type of carrier (the base) – products are either water-borne or solvent-borne.  When low volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and easy clean-up are important, a water-borne product is the better choice.  Water-borne coatings now dominate the market due to increasing environmental regulatory requirements around air quality and health, and customer demand.  Compared to solvent-borne finishes, water-borne finishes usually have less odour and can be cleaned up with water instead of requiring mineral spirits. Water-borne coatings are generally more flexible (less prone to cracking as the wood beneath shrinks and swells from moisture changes) and more vapour permeable.  Water-borne paints are often called latex. Solvent-borne paints are commonly known as oil paints.  Also, paints labeled as alkyds are typically solvent-borne (but not always).  Although it is popular to refer to paints as either latex or oil/alkyd, it is more useful to think of them as water-borne versus solvent-borne. Water-borne coatings, particularly acrylics, are generally less prone to fading and chalking than alkyds. The technology for water-borne paints and finishes has advanced significantly in recent years and is now mature to the extent they can match or exceed the properties of solvent-borne products. Types of Coatings – Film Thickness Sometimes wood coatings are classified by the thickness of film they form on the surface of the wood.  Paints, solid colour stains, and varnishes are often called film-formers, as these create a layer of continuous material sitting on top of the wood.  Semi-transparent stains, transparent stains, water repellents and natural oils are often referred to as penetrating finishes, since they penetrate through the pores of the wood, leaving its surface texture and pores visible, rather than leaving a thick film on top of the wood. However, all coatings leave a film on the surface – thick for some, thin for others – and the “penetrating” products only penetrate a very short distance into the wood.  Nonetheless, it’s helpful to know if a product leaves a thick film, as this type of product can be more difficult to remove if degraded and requiring refinishing.  This is because their failure modes are different – a thick coherent coating like paint fails by cracking and peeling, whereas a thin-film “penetrating” product such as a stain fails by erosion. Can Coatings Protect Wood? Coatings can temporarily protect the surface of wood from sunlight, moisture and weathering, but coatings do not actively protect against decay.  Their purpose is primarily aesthetic. But they slow down the damaging effects of weathering, and do provide some moisture protection, which is a decay factor.  Coatings also help preserve the natural durability of species like western red cedar, by helping to prevent the natural protective agents in this wood from washing out.  The protective benefits of all coatings are, of course, dependent on proper maintenance of the coating.  No coating will last indefinitely, and all need to be periodically reapplied. Weathering

Non-Pressure Treated Wood

Non-Pressure Treated Wood For most treated wood, preservatives are applied in special facilities using pressure. However, sometimes this isn’t possible, or the need for treated wood was not apparent until after construction or building occupancy. In those cases, preservatives can be applied using methods that do not involve pressure vessels. Some of these treatments can only be done by licensed applicators. When using wood preservatives, as with all pesticides, the label requirements of the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (in Canada) or the EPA (in the USA) must be followed. Five categories of non-pressure treatments Treatment during Engineered Wood Product Manufacture Some engineered wood panel products, such as plywood and laminated veneer lumber (LVL) are able to be treated after manufacture with preservative solutions, whereas thin strand based products (OSB, OSL) and small particulate and fibre-based panels (particleboard, MDF) are not. The preservatives must be added to the wood elements before they are bonded together, either as a spray on, mist or powder. Products such as OSB are manufactured from small, thin strands of wood. Powdered preservatives can be mixed in with the strands and resins during the blending process just prior to mat forming and pressing. Zinc borate is commonly used in this application. By adding preservatives to the manufacturing process it’s possible to obtain uniform treatment throughout the thickness of the product.  In North America, plywood is normally protected against decay and termites by pressure treatment processes. However, in other parts of the world insecticides are often formulated with adhesives to protect plywood against termites. Surface pre-treatment This is anticipatory preservative treatment applied by dip, spray or brush application to all of the accessible surfaces of some wood products during the construction process. The intent is to provide a shell of protection to vulnerable wood products, components or systems in their finished form. One example would be spraying house framing with borates for resistance to drywood termites and wood boring beetles in some cases. Such treatments may also be applied to lumber, plywood and OSB to provide additional protection against mould growth. Sub-surface pre-treatment (Depot treatment) This is preservative treatment applied at discrete locations, not to the entire piece, during the manufacturing process or during construction. The intent is to pro-actively provide protection only to the parts of the wood product, component or systems that might be exposed to conditions conducive to decay. One example would be placing borate rods into holes drilled in the exposed ends of glulam beams projecting beyond a roof line. Supplementary treatment This is preservative treatment applied at discrete locations to treated wood in service to compensate for either incomplete initial penetration of the cross section, or depletion of preservative effectiveness over time. The intent is to boost the protection in previously-treated wood, or to address areas exposed by necessary on-site cutting of treated wood products. One example would be the application of a ready-made bandage to utility poles that have suffered depletion of the original preservative loading. Another example is field-cut material for preserved wood foundations. Remedial treatment This is preservative treatment applied to residual sound wood in products, components or systems where decay or insect attack is known to have begun. The intent is to kill existing fungi or insects and/or prevent decay or insects from spreading beyond the existing damage. One example would be roller or spray application of a borate/glycol formulation on sound wood left in place adjacent to decayed framing (which should be cut out and replaced with pressure-treated wood). Formats of non-pressure treatments Non-pressure treatments come in three different forms: solids, liquids/pastes, and fumigants. Unlike pressure-treatment preservatives, which rely on pressure for good penetration, these rely on the mobility of the active ingredients to penetrate deep enough in wood to be effective. The active ingredients can move in the wood via capillarity or can diffuse in water and/or air within the wood. This mobility not only allows the active ingredients to move into the wood but can also allow them to move out under certain conditions. This means the conditions within and around the structure must be understood so the loss of preservative and consequent loss of protection can be minimized. Borates, fluorides and copper compounds are particularly suitable for use as solids, liquids and pastes. Methyl isothiocyanate (and its precursors), methyl bromide, and sulfuryl fluoride are the only widely used fumigant treatments. Methyl bromide was phased out, except for very limited uses, in 2005. Solids The major advantage of solids in these applications is that they maximize the amount of water-soluble material that can be placed into a drilled hole, due to the high percentage of active ingredients contained in commercially-available rods. The major disadvantage is the requirement for sufficient moisture and the time needed for the rod to dissolve. The earliest and best-known solid preservative system is the fused borate rod, originally developed in the 1970s for supplementary and remedial treatment of railroad ties. These have since been used successfully on utility poles, timbers, millwork (window joinery), and a variety of other wood products. A mixture of borates is fused into glass at extremely high temperatures, poured into a mould and allowed to set. Placed into holes in the wood, the borate dissolves in any water contained in the wood and diffuses throughout the moist region. Mass flow of moisture along the grain may speed up distribution of the borate. Secondary biocides such as copper can be added to borate rods to supplement the efficacy of the borates against decay and insects. While all preservatives should be treated with respect, many users feel more comfortable dealing with borate and copper/borate rods because of their low toxicity and low potential for entry into the body. Fluorides are also currently available in a rod form. The rod is produced by compressing sodium fluoride and binders together, or by encapsulation in a water-permeable tubing. Fluorides diffuse more rapidly than borates in water and may also move in the vapour phase as hydrofluoric acid. Zinc borate (ZB) is a powder

Pressure Treated Wood

Preservative-treated wood is typically pressure-treated, where the chemicals are driven a short distance into the wood using a special vessel that combines pressure and vacuum. Although deep penetration is highly desirable, the impermeable nature of dead wood cells makes it extremely difficult to achieve anything more than a thin shell of treated wood. Key results of the pressure-treating process are the amount of preservative impregnated into the wood (called retention), and the depth of penetration. These characteristics of treatment are specified in results-based standards. Greater preservative penetration can be achieved by incising – a process that punches small slits into the wood. This is often needed for large or difficult to treat material to meet results-based penetration standards. Pressure treatment processes vary depending on the type of wood being treated and the preservative being used. In general, wood is first conditioned to remove excess water from the wood. It is then placed inside a pressure vessel and a vacuum is pulled to remove air from inside the wood cells. After this, the preservative is added and pressure applied to force the preservative into the wood. Finally, the pressure is released and a final vacuum applied to remove and reuse excess preservative. After treatment some preservative systems, such as CCA, require an additional fixation step to ensure that the preservative is fully reacted with the wood. Information on the different types of preservatives used can be found under Durability by Treatment

Fire Safety

The National Building Code of Canada (NBC) defines fire safety under Objective OS1: “an objective of this code is to limit the probability that as a result of the design or construction of the building, a person in or adjacent to a building will be exposed to an unacceptable risk of injury due to fire.” In simpler terms, fire safety is the reduction of the potential for harm to life as a result of fire in buildings. Although the potential for being killed or injured in a fire cannot be completely eliminated, fire safety in a building can be achieved through proven building design features intended to minimize the risk of harm to people from fire to the greatest extent possible. Designing a building to ensure minimal risk or to meet a prescribed level of safety from fire is more complex than just the simple consideration of what building materials will be used in construction of the building, since all building materials are affected by fire. Many factors must be considered including the use of the building, the number of occupants, how easily they can exit the building in case of a fire and how a fire can be contained. Even materials that do not sustain fire do not guarantee the safety of a structure. Steel, for instance, quickly loses its strength when heated and its yield point decreases significantly as it absorbs heat, endangering the stability of the structure. An unprotected, conventional cold-formed steel joist floor system will fail in less than 10 minutes under standard laboratory fire exposure test methods, while an unprotected, conventional wood joist floor system can last up to 15 minutes. Reinforced concrete is also not immune to fire. Concrete will spall under elevated temperatures, exposing the steel reinforcement and weakening structural members. As a result, it is generally recognized that there is really no such thing as a fire-proof building. The NBC only regulates those elements which are part of the building construction. The building contents found in any building are typically not regulated by the NBC, but in some cases they are regulated by the National Fire Code of Canada (NFC). The occupancy classification of buildings or parts of buildings according to their intended use accounts for: the quantity and type of combustible contents likely to be present (potential fire load); the number of persons likely to be exposed to the threat of fire; the area of the building; and the height of the building. This occupancy classification is the starting point in determining which fire safety requirements apply to a particular building. The occupancy classification of a building within the NBC dictates: the type of building construction; the level of fire protection; and the degree of structural protection against fire spread between parts of a building that are used for different purposes. Fires can occur in any type of structure. The severity of a fire, however, is contingent on the ability of a construction to: confine the fire; limit a fire’s effects on the supporting structure; and control the spread of smoke and gases. To varying degrees, any type of construction can be designed as a system (combination of construction assemblies) to limit the effects of fire. This allows occupants sufficient time to escape the building and for firefighters to safely carry out their duties. Occupant safety also depends on other parameters such as detection, exit paths, and the use of automatic fire suppression systems such as sprinklers. These concepts form the basis of the NBC requirements. For further information, refer to the following resources: Wood Design Manual (Canadian Wood Council) Fire Safety Design in Buildings (Canadian Wood Council) National Building Code of Canada National Fire Code of Canada CSA O86, Engineering design in wood Fitzgerald, Robert W., Fundamentals of Fire Safe Building Design, Fire Protection Handbook, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1997. Watts, J.M. (Jr); Systems Approach to Fire-Safe Building Design, Fire Protection Handbook, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2008. Rowe, W.D.; Assessing the Risk of Fire Systemically ASTM STP 762, Fire Risk Assessment, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 1982.

Flame Spread

Flame spread is primarily a surface burning characteristic of materials, and a flame-spread rating is a way to compare how rapid flame spreads on the surface of one material compared to another. Flame-spread rating requirements are applied in the National Building Code of Canada (NBC) primarily to regulate interior finishes. Any material that forms part of the building interior and is directly exposed is considered to be an interior finish. This includes interior claddings, flooring, carpeting, doors, trim, windows, and lighting elements. If no cladding is installed on the interior side of an exterior wall of a building, then the interior surfaces of the wall assembly are considered to be the interior finish, for example, unfinished post and beam construction. Similarly, if no ceiling is installed beneath a floor or roof assembly, the unfinished exposed deck and structural members are considered to be the interior ceiling finish. The standard test method that the NBC references for the determination of flame spread ratings is CAN/ULC-S102, published by ULC Standards. Appendix D-3 of the NBC, Division B, provides information related to generic flame-spread ratings and smoke developed classifications of a variety of building materials. Information is only provided for generic materials for which extensive fire test data is available (refer to Table 1 below). For instance, lumber, regardless of species, and Douglas fir, poplar, and spruce plywood, of a thickness not less than those listed, are assigned a flame-spread rating of 150. In general, for wood products up to 25 mm (1 in) thick, the flame-spread rating decreases with increasing thickness. Values given in the Appendix D of the NBC are conservative because they are intended to cover a wide range of materials. Specific species and thicknesses may have values much lower than those listed in Appendix D. Specific ratings by wood species are given in Surface Flammability and Flame-spread Ratings fact-sheet, below. Information on proprietary and fire-retardant materials is available from third-party certification and listing organizations or from manufacturers. The values listed in Surface Flammability and Flame-spread Ratings fact-sheet apply to finished lumber; however, there has been no significant difference in flame-spread rating noted in rough sawn lumber of the same species. The American Wood Council has additional information in their Design for Code Acceptance publication, DCA 1 Flame Spread Performance of Wood Products for the U.S. Normally, the surface finish and the material to which it is applied both contribute to the overall flame-spread performance. Most surface coatings such as paint and wallpaper are usually less than 1 mm thick and will not contribute significantly to the overall rating. This is why the NBC assigns the same flame-spread and smoke developed rating to common materials such as plywood, lumber and gypsum wallboard whether they are unfinished or covered with paint, varnish or cellulosic wallpaper. There are also special fire-retardant paints and coatings that can substantially reduce the flame-spread rating of an interior surface. These coatings are particularly useful when rehabilitating an older building to reduce the flame-spread rating of finish materials to acceptable levels, especially for those areas requiring a flame-spread rating no greater than 25. In general, the NBC sets the maximum flame-spread rating for interior wall and ceiling finishes at 150, which can be met by most wood products. For example, 6 mm (1/4 in) Douglas Fir plywood may be unfinished, painted, varnished or covered with conventional cellulosic wallpaper. This has been found to be acceptable on the basis of actual fire experience. This means that in all areas where a flame-spread rating of 150 is permitted, the majority of wood products may be used as interior finishes without special requirements for fire-retardant treatments or coatings. In a room fire, the flooring is usually the last item to be ignited, since the coolest layer of air is near the floor. For this reason, the NBCC, like most other codes, does not regulate the flame-spread rating of flooring, with the exception of certain essential areas in high buildings: exits; corridors not within suites; elevator cars; and, service spaces. Traditional flooring materials such as hardwood flooring and carpets can be used almost everywhere in buildings of any type of construction. For further information, refer to the following resources: Wood Design Manual (Canadian Wood Council) Fire Safety Design in Buildings (Canadian Wood Council) National Building Code of Canada National Fire Code of Canada CSA O86, Engineering design in wood CAN/ULC-S102 Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials and Assemblies American Wood Council Table 1 : Assigned flame-spread ratings and smoke developed classifications Surface Flammability and Flame-spread Ratings